2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variability in sung productions of adolescents who stutter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, within-vowel-category dispersion was higher in speech than in song. This is consistent with the idea that singing compared to speaking provides more stability in the vowel domain, in duration, but also in pitch and formant structure [11,12]. At the same time, vowel space expansion appeared overall smaller in song than in speech, mainly due to more closed articulation of /a/ in singing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, within-vowel-category dispersion was higher in speech than in song. This is consistent with the idea that singing compared to speaking provides more stability in the vowel domain, in duration, but also in pitch and formant structure [11,12]. At the same time, vowel space expansion appeared overall smaller in song than in speech, mainly due to more closed articulation of /a/ in singing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As in speech, infants prefer ID over AD versions of songs [10]. On the other hand, singing generally differs from speaking in that sung vowels usually display more stable f0 contours, and that they are longer and less variable in duration [11,12]. ID singing also features higher metrical regularity ("beat structure") than ID speech [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If acoustic focus and/or a slow speaking rate were necessary and sufficient for a mature segmentation response, the song familiarization should have elicited a group-level negative-going response or enabled more children to display this response. Thus, the observed positivity in the song familiarization could reflect additional challenges segmenting words from songs, such as the atypical acoustic signal of sung compared to spoken language [41,42]; cf. [43], or the increased risk of mis-segmentations from songs [44,45,123].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is not trivial that infants pick up linguistic information from songs. Firstly, infants' speech-honed language-learning skills may not be successful when applied to the acoustic signal of songs: lyrics sung to a melody are produced with different acoustic features than regular speech [41], including a more compressed and less consistently produced acoustic vowel space [42], cf. [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The melodic function is another mechanism that allows speech fluency improvement based on decreased speech motor control dependence on the internal model. Prosody is a resource of human expression that aims to provide more efficient and appropriate communication from the transmission of paralinguistic information such as tone, intonation, stress, and length (8,9) . When a predetermined melody or speech rhythm is used, clues of length, frequency, and intensity are available and used by the speech motor control system, facilitating fluency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%