2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variability in phytoplankton pigments, picoplankton and coccolithophores along a transect through the North Atlantic and tropical southwestern Pacific

Abstract: International audienceBiogeochemical processes in the sea are triggered in various ways by chlorophyll-containing phytoplankton groups. While the variability of chlorophyll concentration at sea has been observed from satellites for several years, these groups are known only from cruises which are limited in space and time. The Geochemistry, Phytoplankton and Color of the Ocean programme (GeP&CO) was set up to describe and understand the variability of phytoplankton composition on large spatial scales under a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further corroborated by the presence of surface diatom-dominated blooms at stations where drawdown of alkalinity had occurred and PIC had accumulated below the pycnocline, reminiscent of prior coccolithophorid calcification (Table SP5) (Suykens et al, 2010). Furthermore, our findings confirm previous reports (Barlow et al, 1993(Barlow et al, , 2002Gibb et al, 2001;Joint et al, 2001;Lampert et al, 2002;Dandonneau et al, 2006;Leblanc et al, 2009) which show that the late spring blooms in the NE Atlantic are composed of mixed assemblages, dominated by diatoms and coccolithophores, but also with important contributions of prasinophytes and dinoflagellates.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Community Structuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is further corroborated by the presence of surface diatom-dominated blooms at stations where drawdown of alkalinity had occurred and PIC had accumulated below the pycnocline, reminiscent of prior coccolithophorid calcification (Table SP5) (Suykens et al, 2010). Furthermore, our findings confirm previous reports (Barlow et al, 1993(Barlow et al, , 2002Gibb et al, 2001;Joint et al, 2001;Lampert et al, 2002;Dandonneau et al, 2006;Leblanc et al, 2009) which show that the late spring blooms in the NE Atlantic are composed of mixed assemblages, dominated by diatoms and coccolithophores, but also with important contributions of prasinophytes and dinoflagellates.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Community Structuresupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The evidence for the phenomenon is based on direct sampling of surface waters and uses a straightforward technique (visual examination of SEM images; 3,500 cells were examined in the Bay of Biscay and 8,900 cells were examined in total). Our findings agree with other data: (i) the same pattern recurred along our transect in 2009-2010 (SI Appendix, Tables S12-S21); (ii) summer dominance of type A morphotypes was also seen during crossings in 2006 (SI Appendix, Table S22) and 2007 (SI Appendix, Table S23) (winters were not sampled in these years); (iii) the same trend in morphotypes was seen in the more abundant detached coccoliths (SI Appendix, section 1 and Table S24); and (v) a similar morphotype seasonality was seen in less-frequently collected data from farther west in the Atlantic (21). Horizontal advection of a patch of water cannot explain a seasonal shift occurring all along the transect (deep water and shelf) and in multiple years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Within the following discussion, several areas, characterized by atypical pigment distributions and associations, will be depicted. (Claustre and Marty, 1995;Bidigare and Ondrusek, 1996;Mackey et al, 1996;Dandonneau et al, 2006). In these strongly illuminated waters, cyanobacteria essentially dominate the phytoplankton populations.…”
Section: Deviations With Respect To the Global Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%