2021
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-4571-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal variability and driving factors of the carbonate system in the Aransas Ship Channel, TX, USA: a time series study

Abstract: Abstract. The coastal ocean is affected by an array of co-occurring biogeochemical and anthropogenic processes, resulting in substantial heterogeneity in water chemistry, including carbonate chemistry parameters such as pH and partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2). To better understand coastal and estuarine acidification and air-sea CO2 fluxes, it is important to study baseline variability and driving factors of carbonate chemistry. Using both discrete bottle sample collection (2014–2020) and hourly sensor measuremen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 5, unlike for the surface pH T and bottom Ω A , temperature showed a significant linear relationship with pH T , pCO 2 , and Ω A , with all data considered (n = 192), confirming the dominant role of seasonal changes in temperature on these CO 2 parameters (especially the pH T and pCO 2 ). Similar results have been found in other survey sites, such as the Patos Lagoon [61], Gulf of Mexico [62], Aransas Ship Channel [63], East China Sea [64], Northern South China Sea [65], and Pearl River Estuary [66]. Furthermore, based on the above linear relationship (i.e., temperature vs. CO 2 parameters), the seasonal variation in temperature, i.e., 17.9-34.5 • C, can be estimated to explain 11.6% (43.4%), 17.9% (44.4%), and 55.6% (3.3%) of the changes in pH T , pCO 2 , and Ω A of the surface (bottom) waters.…”
Section: Comparison Of Co 2 Parameters With Other Reefs Around the Worldsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 5, unlike for the surface pH T and bottom Ω A , temperature showed a significant linear relationship with pH T , pCO 2 , and Ω A , with all data considered (n = 192), confirming the dominant role of seasonal changes in temperature on these CO 2 parameters (especially the pH T and pCO 2 ). Similar results have been found in other survey sites, such as the Patos Lagoon [61], Gulf of Mexico [62], Aransas Ship Channel [63], East China Sea [64], Northern South China Sea [65], and Pearl River Estuary [66]. Furthermore, based on the above linear relationship (i.e., temperature vs. CO 2 parameters), the seasonal variation in temperature, i.e., 17.9-34.5 • C, can be estimated to explain 11.6% (43.4%), 17.9% (44.4%), and 55.6% (3.3%) of the changes in pH T , pCO 2 , and Ω A of the surface (bottom) waters.…”
Section: Comparison Of Co 2 Parameters With Other Reefs Around the Worldsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For different regions (DAB, DLB, and YMKSA), the response of the CO 2 systems to seasonal temperature changes was different (Figure 5), which may be caused by the enhancement or canceling out of physical processes and biological processes [63]. As shown in Figure 5, temperature was significantly correlated with pH T , pCO 2 , and surface Ω A (p < 0.001) in the DLB, and temperature changes can reveal 49.1-72.5% variations in those CO 2 parameters, suggesting the important control role of temperature.…”
Section: Comparison Of Co 2 Parameters With Other Reefs Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water sampling and analytical methods were detailed in our previous studies (Yao and Hu, 2017;Mccutcheon et al, 2021). Briefly, water column salinity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured using a calibrated multisonde.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%