2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal unpredictability of a stimulus sequence affects brain activation differently depending on cognitive task demands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…attractor states, suffices to explain WM functions 9, 10 . Here, we considered the N -back task with variances in the timing of input stimuli 22 to draw conclusions on this dynamics. First, we showed that in purely transient systems the information about the N past stimuli is stored, as expected, in distinguishable trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…attractor states, suffices to explain WM functions 9, 10 . Here, we considered the N -back task with variances in the timing of input stimuli 22 to draw conclusions on this dynamics. First, we showed that in purely transient systems the information about the N past stimuli is stored, as expected, in distinguishable trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependent on the timing of the stimuli, this information has to be continuously updated. Interestingly, whether the stimuli are presented with exact inter-stimulus timing or with unreliable timing does not influence the subject’s performance of solving the N -back task 22 . This result indicates that the mechanisms implementing WM are robust against variance in the timing of the input stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond attention, the parietal areas found here have been considered significant in representing prediction-related activity. During temporally unpredictable situations, right parietal activations have been observed, independent of WM load [26], and posterior parietal cortex has been associated with generating temporal expectancies [27]. In a recent meta-analysis, bilateral inferior parietal lobule (focus in IPS) was found to be sensitive to the magnitude of surprise in a reinforcement learning situation [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foram analisados 10 comportamentos agrupados da seguinte forma: Categoria de comportamentos dirigidos ao bebedouro 3 Mais do que saber a resposta correta a partir da distribuição dos estímulos apresentados no ambiente, é preciso saber quando as ações devem ser executadas, para uma melhor eficiência na estratégia comportamental. O NAC aparece como uma estrutura que organiza temporalmente as ações do animal no sentido de avaliar a chegada de estímulos iminentes (Singh et al, 2011;Koppe et al, 2014). Esta relação entre NAC e controle temporal ainda apresenta dados divergentes.…”
Section: Repertório Comportamental E Omissãounclassified