2020
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.028910
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Trends in Stroke Incidence Over Time by Sex and Age in the GCNKSS

Abstract: Background and Purpose— Sex differences in stroke incidence over time were previously reported from the GCNKSS (Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study). We aimed to determine whether these differences continued through 2015 and whether they were driven by particular age groups. Methods— Within the GCNKSS population of 1.3 million, incident (first ever) strokes among residents ≥20 years of age were ascertained at all local hospitals during 5 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
88
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
88
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the men/women IRR vanished over time, and the excess of incidence in women was no longer statistically significant after 2003 (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62–1.26, p = 0.24). A similar result was found in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study that reported a women/men IRR of 1.30 (95% CI: 0.87–1.74) in 2005 that even reversed in 2015 (IRR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54–1.10) [17]. These trends could reflect a more important increase in the incidence of ischemic stroke in young men than in young women between the 90s and early 2000s, together with a slight decrease in women observed in the very recent years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the men/women IRR vanished over time, and the excess of incidence in women was no longer statistically significant after 2003 (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62–1.26, p = 0.24). A similar result was found in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study that reported a women/men IRR of 1.30 (95% CI: 0.87–1.74) in 2005 that even reversed in 2015 (IRR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.54–1.10) [17]. These trends could reflect a more important increase in the incidence of ischemic stroke in young men than in young women between the 90s and early 2000s, together with a slight decrease in women observed in the very recent years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Hence, in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky population-based study, higher incidence rates of ischemic stroke were noted in patients aged 20–54 years between 1993/94 and year 2005 [5]. In a more recent analysis, the authors reported a slight decrease in the incidence in women aged 20–44 years between 2005 and 2015 (from 35/100,000/year; 95% CI: 27–42, to 26/100,000/year; 95% CI: 19–32), contrasting to a stable incidence in men (from 27/100,000/year; 95% CI: 20–33, to 31/100,000/year; 95% CI: 24–38) [17]. No change was observed during the same period in patients aged 45–64 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies report that stroke is more common among men, but women are more likely to become more disabled from stroke and have a higher death rate. 5 Strokes are more common in Black and Hispanic adults across all age groups, as compared to White adults. 6 People with the traditional stroke risk factors of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, and smoking are at greater risk for stroke as well.…”
Section: What Do We Know About Stroke?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common localization of ischemic stroke is middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. The anterior cerebral artery (ACA), vertebrobasilar artery (VBA), and the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), less frequently, maybe the reason for ischemic stroke 5 . There are many risk factors for ischemic stroke, including hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary heart diseases (CAD), congestive heart failure (CHF), smoking and alcohol consumption, hyperlipidemia (HPL), inappropriate diet, physical inactivity, abdominal obesity, and prosthetic heart valves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%