2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Prescription in Atrial Fibrillation Patients between 2004 and 2019

Abstract: Background: In the recent years, antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed significantly. The main aim of this study is to assess the temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy and identify factors predisposing oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in stroke prevention in AF patients. Methods: The present study is a retrospective, observational, single-center study, which includes consecutively hospitalized patients in the reference cardiology center from January 2004 to December 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 36 The high rate of oral anticoagulant use, preference for DOACs rather than VKA, and low prevalence of absolute contraindications to anticoagulation were also consistent with large-scale observational cohorts. 37–39 As expected from a trial recruiting patients admitted with AF, we saw more first-onset and paroxysmal AF than those with permanent AF. Data on the use of rhythm control are less easy to compare with other studies due to marked differences in patient populations and regional differences in who is able to receive (or be reimbursed) for rhythm control procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“… 36 The high rate of oral anticoagulant use, preference for DOACs rather than VKA, and low prevalence of absolute contraindications to anticoagulation were also consistent with large-scale observational cohorts. 37–39 As expected from a trial recruiting patients admitted with AF, we saw more first-onset and paroxysmal AF than those with permanent AF. Data on the use of rhythm control are less easy to compare with other studies due to marked differences in patient populations and regional differences in who is able to receive (or be reimbursed) for rhythm control procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%