2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal trend in early sepsis in a very low birth weight infants' cohort: an opportunity for a rational antimicrobial use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feature of the current study's finding is a global feature and a concern as well, as seen in Tanzania [14]. Though the magnitudes of the average percentage change vary, the current incidence trend is in the same direction as the declining percentage changes in Brazil [51], India [39], the United States, and the 2020 global report [13,52]. Of note, the current study result implies an inconsistent decline in the incidence trend, necessitating close monitoring of the progress toward the global neonatal sepsis initiatives in the study area.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The feature of the current study's finding is a global feature and a concern as well, as seen in Tanzania [14]. Though the magnitudes of the average percentage change vary, the current incidence trend is in the same direction as the declining percentage changes in Brazil [51], India [39], the United States, and the 2020 global report [13,52]. Of note, the current study result implies an inconsistent decline in the incidence trend, necessitating close monitoring of the progress toward the global neonatal sepsis initiatives in the study area.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The relative variation in the prevalence of neonatal sepsis between our study and other studies could largely be attributable to differences in study design and period of review. For instance, while some studies have applied a case-control design [ 21 ] others were based on cohort analysis [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%