1973
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-65352-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Transfer Properties of the Afferent Visual System Psychophysical,Neurophysiological and Theoretical Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
3

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 419 publications
3
21
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their loss is at more moderate rates, at which normals can see not only that a light is¯ickering but also that it is either on or off at each given moment. This ability to individuate the successive states of the light gives way to an experience of steady¯icker at a frequency of 8 Hz or so in normals, and this threshold rate is called the Gestalt¯icker fusion rate (van de Grind et al, 1973). Above this limit of 7±10 Hz, subjects cannot perform attentive tracking, report the direction of apparent motion, or make phase judgements for widely spaced items (Forte et al, 1999;Verstraten et al, 2000;Victor and Conte, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their loss is at more moderate rates, at which normals can see not only that a light is¯ickering but also that it is either on or off at each given moment. This ability to individuate the successive states of the light gives way to an experience of steady¯icker at a frequency of 8 Hz or so in normals, and this threshold rate is called the Gestalt¯icker fusion rate (van de Grind et al, 1973). Above this limit of 7±10 Hz, subjects cannot perform attentive tracking, report the direction of apparent motion, or make phase judgements for widely spaced items (Forte et al, 1999;Verstraten et al, 2000;Victor and Conte, 2002).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Detecting the rapid changes of¯icker is not the same as experiencing each light and dark phase of the¯icker as individual events, a percept referred to as Gestalt¯icker (van de Grind et al, 1973) and having a much lower threshold rate (7±8 Hz; Verstraten et al, 2000). The parietal patients may have preserved the detection of¯icker but suffered a loss in the rate at which they can individuate events with attention.…”
Section: Experiments 3: Testing Different Phase Shiftscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…In order to obtain the same light intensity for both functions, the square wave had to have a slightly lower modulation (60%) than the sine wave (100%). Nevertheless, this is not likely to have had an important effect on the results as modulation down to even 35% is only expected to have a slight effect on CFF values (van de Grind et al, 1973). The aim of using the two different functions was to confirm that flickering stimuli produced by slightly different methods result in similar estimates of CFF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 38%
“…For example, subjects can detect the presence of rapid flicker at rates up to 60 Hz or more. However, if subjects are asked to discriminate between the light and dark phase of the flicker as individual events (a percept referred to as Gestalt flicker), the maximum rate is an order of magnitude lower, 6 to 8 Hz [34].…”
Section: Discriminating the Order Of Visual Eventsmentioning
confidence: 46%