2019
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal sweetness profile of the emerging sweetener MNEI in stirred yogurt

Abstract: Yogurt is widely consumed by people under‐controlled dietary regimes. The addition of hypocaloric sweeteners to the yogurt is typically used to make them more palatable, but this may affect the fermentation phase and/or its physical and sensory characteristics. The aim of this work was to test the possible application of an emerging sweetener, MNEI, a variant of a sweet protein, monellin. In particular, its sweetness profile was compared with that of other natural sweeteners, sucrose, xylitol, and sorbitol, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dominance duration of sweet over time differed significantly among the four different yogurts used in this study although they were formulated with iso‐sweet concentrations. In the present study, determination of iso‐sweet concentration of sweeteners employed the sip and spit method (Miele et al., 2019). However, temporal evaluation of sensory attributes of yogurts involved the use of the multiple intake TDS method (Jager et al., 2014) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dominance duration of sweet over time differed significantly among the four different yogurts used in this study although they were formulated with iso‐sweet concentrations. In the present study, determination of iso‐sweet concentration of sweeteners employed the sip and spit method (Miele et al., 2019). However, temporal evaluation of sensory attributes of yogurts involved the use of the multiple intake TDS method (Jager et al., 2014) in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 15 panelists aged between 21 and 50 years of age participated in this test. In reference to previous literature (Ban et al., 2020; Costa et al., 2019; Pereira et al., 2021), two concentrations of xylitol (9 g and 10 g/100 g), stevia (0.15 g and 0.20 g/100 g), and monk fruit (0.10 g and 0.15 g/100 g) were prepared and evaluated using the sip and spit method (Miele et al., 2019). Each sample was served at room temperature in plastic cups coded with three‐digit random numbers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen panelists of Embrapa Florestas (employees) with more than 50 hr of training in sensory studies were used to evaluate the chewing gum selected from the acceptance test. The panelists evaluated the general taste duration in the sample, recording the intensity of this attribute in accordance with the time spent (e.g., Miele et al., 2019; Palazzo & Bolini, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests were performed in a sensory analysis laboratory according to ISO 8589 (ISO, 2007). Yogurt samples were prepared the day before and refrigerated at 4 C. Each yogurt sample (10 ml) was served at 15 C in a plastic cup coded with a three-digit random number (Miele et al, 2019). Pâté samples were prepared the day before and refrigerated at 4 C in glass containers.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%