2021
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1914106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal, Sex-Specific, Social Media-Based Alcohol Influences during the Transition to College

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study included in this review followed adolescents aged 12 until they were young adults aged 22 (3% of the articles included). Longitudinal associations (examined in 50% of the articles included in this review) are similar with greater baseline exposure associated with increased alcohol use 6 weeks (Davis et al, 2021), 6 months later (Boyle et al, 2016) or 12 months later (Erevik, Torsheim, Andreassen, et al, 2017) among college students. In Erevik, Torsheim, Andreassen, et al (2017), associations between exposure, own sharing, and use 12 months later persisted across five separate models with varying numbers of covariates included (i.e., no covariates, and covariates in the domains of demographics and personality, social media use, baseline alcohol use, alcohol-related cognitions).…”
Section: Part I: Nonspecific Content Exposurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…One study included in this review followed adolescents aged 12 until they were young adults aged 22 (3% of the articles included). Longitudinal associations (examined in 50% of the articles included in this review) are similar with greater baseline exposure associated with increased alcohol use 6 weeks (Davis et al, 2021), 6 months later (Boyle et al, 2016) or 12 months later (Erevik, Torsheim, Andreassen, et al, 2017) among college students. In Erevik, Torsheim, Andreassen, et al (2017), associations between exposure, own sharing, and use 12 months later persisted across five separate models with varying numbers of covariates included (i.e., no covariates, and covariates in the domains of demographics and personality, social media use, baseline alcohol use, alcohol-related cognitions).…”
Section: Part I: Nonspecific Content Exposurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The systematic review identified four prospective cohort studies that investigated the link between self‐posting of alcohol‐related content on SNS and current average consumption [37, 39, 50, 51]. A meta‐analysis was unable to be conducted due to non‐comparable effect estimates between studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies identified were from the United States and Australia (Tables 1-2). Of the studies assessing exposure to alcoholrelated content on SNS, eight were prospective cohort studies [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and nine were cross-sectional studies [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Of the studies exploring self-posting of alcohol-related content on SNS, five were prospective cohort [37,39,[49][50][51] and 14 [40,41,43,48,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] were cross-sectional designs.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Davis et al (2021) found perceived peer alcohol content posts to prospectively predict alcohol frequency during the transition to college above and beyond one's own positing of alcohol content. Findings among adolescent samples produce similar conclusions.…”
Section: Perceptions Of Peer Alcohol Content Posting To Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Research with first‐year college students found perceptions of the frequency of peer alcohol content posts during the first 6 weeks of college to prospectively predict alcohol consumption 6 months later (Boyle et al, 2016). Similarly, Davis et al (2021) found perceived peer alcohol content posts to prospectively predict alcohol frequency during the transition to college above and beyond one's own positing of alcohol content. Findings among adolescent samples produce similar conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%