1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90168-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the period histograms of Figures 1 and 2 show that spikes occur over narrower ranges within the modulation period as the fiber adapts across time. This contrasts with the observations using electric sinusoidal stimuli in which the spike distribution with the sinusoidal period widened as stimulus level was decreased (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987b). One likely reason for this difference is our use of partial (10%) amplitude modulation of the carrier.…”
Section: Modulation Coding By Anfs: Effects Of Level and Stimulus Durcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, the period histograms of Figures 1 and 2 show that spikes occur over narrower ranges within the modulation period as the fiber adapts across time. This contrasts with the observations using electric sinusoidal stimuli in which the spike distribution with the sinusoidal period widened as stimulus level was decreased (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987b). One likely reason for this difference is our use of partial (10%) amplitude modulation of the carrier.…”
Section: Modulation Coding By Anfs: Effects Of Level and Stimulus Durcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…We note, however, that in 2 of 6 fibers of Figure 4, initial (1-ms window) rates were greater than 1000 spike/s, as two spikes were often registered within a single bin. Relatively high onset rates with electric stimuli are consistent with the observation that, when compared with acoustic stimuli, electric stimuli can transiently drive fibers to respond with short ISIs, i.e., more effectively drive fibers out of states of partial refractoriness (van den Honert and Stypulkowski 1987b;Miller et al 2001). Comparisons of onset rates obtained across studies that used different bin widths are problematic.…”
Section: Fig 13mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast, frequency-modulation discrimination using a high modulation rate of 10 Hz, in which phase-locking cues are considered less useful (because of the short time the stimulus spends at the frequency extremes), does follow the predictions of models based on excitation patterns. Given that electrophysiological experiments show a higher degree of phase-locking of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation than occurs with acoustic stimulation (Hartmann and Klinke, 1990;Javel, 1990;van den Honert and Stypulkowski, 1987), it is perhaps surprising that there is no evidence that implantees can use phase locking cues above several hundred Hertz. It is possible that implantees have a limitation in their temporal discrimination that is additional to that in normally hearing listeners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%