2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal resolution of vegetation indices and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data affects the accuracy of vegetation phenology estimation: A study using in-situ measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that some errors might be introduced into data during the period of observing and processing data. During the observing period, some errors might be caused by environment condition, such as poor weather, unstable illumination, large solar zenith angle, which will influence the quality of observed data [63], [64]. As some research reported, variations of SIFyield (SIF/PAR/fPAR) were entirely overshadowed by the noise present in the spectral measurements and the retrieved values at canopy scale [65].…”
Section: Influence Of Random Error On Relative Importance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that some errors might be introduced into data during the period of observing and processing data. During the observing period, some errors might be caused by environment condition, such as poor weather, unstable illumination, large solar zenith angle, which will influence the quality of observed data [63], [64]. As some research reported, variations of SIFyield (SIF/PAR/fPAR) were entirely overshadowed by the noise present in the spectral measurements and the retrieved values at canopy scale [65].…”
Section: Influence Of Random Error On Relative Importance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opportunities are emerging with new spatial data and technologies to monitor spatiotemporal patterns of phenology and environmental factors within and across cities. Phenology indicators based on suninduced chlorophyll fluorescence are better proxies of photosynthetic activities compared to traditional greenness phenology data [62,63], while urban phenology indicators derived from high spatial resolution satellite observations such as Landsat can better capture heterogeneous information in complex urban environments [64]. The recently developed Black Marble night-time lights product [65] and gridded air temperature dataset [66] provide novel data to study the impact of artificial light and temperature on phenology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study analyzed the correlation between seasonal GPP and phenological factors, but the separate contributions of the changes of phenology factors and GPP max to seasonal and annual GPP were not quantified. In recent years, global scale solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides a better surrogate for studies of large-scale vegetation phenology and GPP [81,82]. The study of phenology monitoring by SIF remote sensing may lead to further discoveries on the influence of phenology on vegetation photosynthesis and carbon sequestration in the source region of the Yellow River.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%