2014
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal relation between top-down and bottom-up processing in lexical tone perception

Abstract: Speech perception entails both top-down processing that relies primarily on language experience and bottom-up processing that depends mainly on instant auditory input. Previous models of speech perception often claim that bottom-up processing occurs in an early time window, whereas top-down processing takes place in a late time window after stimulus onset. In this paper, we evaluated the temporal relation of both types of processing in lexical tone perception. We conducted a series of event-related potential (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(138 reference statements)
2
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Accumulating evidence suggests that perception of tone in speech involves a complicated, multi-level cortical network (Shuai and Gong, 2014;Roll et al, 2015;Si et al, 2017;Soderstrom et al, 2017;Schremm et al, 2018). For example, event-related potential (ERP) studies (Shuai and Gong, 2014) indicate temporally overlapping but spatially separate top-down, linguistic processing and bottom-up, auditory processing of lexical tones with linguistic processing lateralized toward the left hemisphere and auditory processing toward the right hemisphere. Cortical surface recordings (Si et al, 2017) further distinguished a distributed cooperative network consisting of bilateral temporal and frontal motor areas in native Chinese speakers passively listening to tones in an oddball paradigm, with strong temporal-on-motor influence in the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence suggests that perception of tone in speech involves a complicated, multi-level cortical network (Shuai and Gong, 2014;Roll et al, 2015;Si et al, 2017;Soderstrom et al, 2017;Schremm et al, 2018). For example, event-related potential (ERP) studies (Shuai and Gong, 2014) indicate temporally overlapping but spatially separate top-down, linguistic processing and bottom-up, auditory processing of lexical tones with linguistic processing lateralized toward the left hemisphere and auditory processing toward the right hemisphere. Cortical surface recordings (Si et al, 2017) further distinguished a distributed cooperative network consisting of bilateral temporal and frontal motor areas in native Chinese speakers passively listening to tones in an oddball paradigm, with strong temporal-on-motor influence in the right hemisphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of children in GASP Test 6, which assesses the ability to listen for at least 60 months of CI use (CNS), with an impact on auditory processing abilities and the development of spoken language. Auditory perception consists of two types of processing: the bottom-up, which comprises sensory information, and the top-down, which encompasses aspects such as cognition, memory, language and attention (14,25) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that segments are more left lateralised than lexical tones (X. Shuai & Gong, 2014). Given that lexical information is processed dominantly in the left hemisphere (McDermotta, Petersen, Watson, & Ojemanna, 2003;Liebentral, Binder, Spitzer, Possing, & Medler, 2005), it may take less effort to access the segmental information and semantic information during lexical processing compared with the tonal information.…”
Section: Implications For Theory Policy or Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, these findings suggest that (1) both native and non‐native Mandarin speakers process tone as a linguistic unit and (2) even a short period of training may lead to cortical modification among L2 learners. However, it is important to note that segments are more left lateralised than lexical tones (X. Li et al, ; Shuai & Gong, ). Given that lexical information is processed dominantly in the left hemisphere (McDermotta, Petersen, Watson, & Ojemanna, ; Liebentral, Binder, Spitzer, Possing, & Medler, ), it may take less effort to access the segmental information and semantic information during lexical processing compared with the tonal information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%