Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study

Abstract

The personal assessments of the current and expected future state of the environment by 3232 community respondents in 18 nations were investigated at the local, national, and global spatial levels. These assessments were compared to a ranking of each country’s environmental quality by an expert panel. Temporal pessimism (“things will get worse”) was found in the assessments at all three spatial levels. Spatial optimism bias (“things are better here than there”) was found in the assessments of current environmental conditions in 15 of 18 countries, but not in the assessments of the future. All countries except one exhibited temporal pessimism, but significant differences between them were common. Evaluations of current environmental conditions also differed by country. Citizens’ assessments of current conditions, and the degree of comparative optimism, were strongly correlated with the expert panel’s assessments of national environmental quality. Aside from the value of understanding global trends in environmental assessments, the results have important implications for environmental policy and risk management strategies

Visualizing Stakeholder Perspectives for Reflection and Dialogue on Scale Dynamics in Social–Ecological Systems

“…Participants in research by Boniecki (1980), Hoogstra andSchanz (2009), andSimons et al (2004) showed a lack of engagement with events on a temporal extent beyond 10-15 years. In contrast to this spatial and temporal "myopia," a "hyperopia" has been found linked to both scales in terms of problem recognition (Gifford et al, 2009;Uzzell, 2000): the longer term future was seen as more problematic than the shorter term by participants in these studies, and global concerns were seen as more problematic than local issues. Other psychological research has dealt with personal views of temporal and geographic scale related to environmental change concerns (Gifford et al, 2009;Lima & Castro, 2005;Uzzell, 2000), but this research has not been operationalized to provide direct input for a participatory social-ecological systems governance context.…”

Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?

“…Research shows that environmental problems are often perceived as remote rather than as immediate threats (e.g. Gifford et al, 2009;Spence, Poortinga, & Pidgeon, 2012), which could be the reason behind why the strength of stated behavioural intentions was more sensitive to individual differences in CFC-Future than in CFC-Immediate.…”

Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges.

“…A growing number of studies show the relevance of place-based, or locally anchored, psychological processes, such as place attachment and place identity, for various global change-related pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. Examples include the reduction of water consumption (Bonaiuto et al, 2008), the support of biodiversity conservation policies Carrus et al 2005 (Gifford et al 2009). Local norms affecting specific pro-environmental choices, such as home waste recycling (Fornara et al, 2011) or towel reuse by hotel guests (Goldstein et al, 2008) are also specific to clearly defined locations.…”