Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2567574.2567609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal learning analytics for computer based testing

Abstract: Predicting student's performance is a challenging, yet complicated task for institutions, instructors and learners. Accurate predictions of performance could lead to improved learning outcomes and increased goal achievement. In this paper we explore the predictive capabilities of student's time-spent on answering (in-)correctly each question of a multiple-choice assessment quiz, along with student's final quiz-score, in the context of computer-based testing. We also explore the correlation between the time-spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Shahiri & Husain (2015) conducted a systematic literature review to observe the characteristics substantially contributing to the prediction of class-room performances. Cumulative grade point (CGPA) and assessments (such as assignments and quiz marks) were considered to be the two primary attributes to assess students' performance (Elakia & Aarthi, 2014;Mayilvaganan & Kalpanadevi, 2014;Papamitsiou et al, 2014;Tucker et al, 2014). Another perspective encompasses factors of students' legacy data (such as past performances in previous assessments/entry test etc.)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shahiri & Husain (2015) conducted a systematic literature review to observe the characteristics substantially contributing to the prediction of class-room performances. Cumulative grade point (CGPA) and assessments (such as assignments and quiz marks) were considered to be the two primary attributes to assess students' performance (Elakia & Aarthi, 2014;Mayilvaganan & Kalpanadevi, 2014;Papamitsiou et al, 2014;Tucker et al, 2014). Another perspective encompasses factors of students' legacy data (such as past performances in previous assessments/entry test etc.)…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All attributes will be grouped in one attribute called internal assessment. The attributes are mostly used among the researchers to predict students performance [5,17,18,19,20,21,10,22,23,12].…”
Section: The Important Attributes Used In Predicting Student's Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the needs of our research, we configured a simplified version of the LAERS assessment environment (Papamitsiou, Terzis, & Economides, 2014). We implemented a testing mechanism and a tracker that logs student temporal activity data during testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also embedded a questionnaire into the system in order to gather self-reported data. Initial results (Papamitsiou, Terzis, & Economides, 2014) highlighted a detected trend that TTAC and TTAW have a significant direct positive and negative effect on AP respectively, and they both have a significant direct positive effect on (un-)certainty. Moreover, GE is a determinant of TTAC and TTAW, and (un-)certainty is a determinant of AP as well.…”
Section: Contribution and Work In Progressmentioning
confidence: 96%