1978
DOI: 10.1121/1.381738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal integration of tone glides

Abstract: Temporal integration of rising and falling tone glides against a 50-2800-Hz background of noise at a sound pressure level of 60 dB re 20 micronPa was studied in two experiments. Glides were in the frequency ranges 200-700 Hz and 1200-1700 Hz for durations of 5-120 ms. Results indicate an asymmetry in the detectability of rising and falling glides of short duration, with rising glides detected at lower signal intensities in both frequency ranges. These effects are discussed in terms of differences in pattern of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found a suboptimal neural encoding of periodicity in FFRs to falling linguistically-relevant tonal contours, relative to rising contours. This pitch direction asymmetry has also been documented in FFRs to non-speech signals (Krishnan & Parkinson, 2000; Krishnan et al, 2004) and in psychoacoustic experiments (Collins & Cullen Jr, 1978) in which rising tones differences were better discriminated than the ones between falling tones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…They found a suboptimal neural encoding of periodicity in FFRs to falling linguistically-relevant tonal contours, relative to rising contours. This pitch direction asymmetry has also been documented in FFRs to non-speech signals (Krishnan & Parkinson, 2000; Krishnan et al, 2004) and in psychoacoustic experiments (Collins & Cullen Jr, 1978) in which rising tones differences were better discriminated than the ones between falling tones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…1). In the earlier report, the ability to detect UP was much better than DOWN at stimulus durations above 20 ms, and we interpreted the up/down asymmetry finding, in particular, as the result of a low-level (basilar membrane) explanation for such a behavioral discrimination performance, consistent with the position espoused by Collins and Cullen (1978) and Dau et al (2000). However, such FM direction selectivity is always confused and affected by possible subject bias strategy, especially in a binary judgment task (e.g., 2AFC here), and by calculating two important parameters d-prime and b normalized in signal detection theory, we can get a clearer understanding of the factors underlying performance.…”
Section: Fm Direction Selectivity and 'Bias Strategy'supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Given their similarities, the most outstanding difference between the maskers is their sweep direction. The experiments beating most closely on these results are masking experiments which use frequency sweeps either as maskers (Zwicker, 1974;Smoorenburg and Coninx, 1980;Kemp, 1982) or as test signals (Collins and Cullen, 1978;Nfib•lek, 1978;Cullen and Collins, 1982). All these studies include cases where the sweep direction influences the masked threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%