1997
DOI: 10.1086/304894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Evolution of Nonthermal Spectra from Supernova Remnants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
244
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
244
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple model of the evolution of SNRs is explained by three phases; the free expansion phase in which the shock velocity is constant, the Sedov-Taylor phase in which the shock expands adiabatically, and the radiative phase in which the energy is lost by radiation (e.g., Sturner et al 1997;Yamazaki et al 2006). The shock velocity V s for each phase is written by function of the age of SNRs t as follows: is an expansion energy in unit of 10 51 erg, and n 0 is an uniform ambient density in unit of cm −3 .…”
Section: Appendix B Evolution Of Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple model of the evolution of SNRs is explained by three phases; the free expansion phase in which the shock velocity is constant, the Sedov-Taylor phase in which the shock expands adiabatically, and the radiative phase in which the energy is lost by radiation (e.g., Sturner et al 1997;Yamazaki et al 2006). The shock velocity V s for each phase is written by function of the age of SNRs t as follows: is an expansion energy in unit of 10 51 erg, and n 0 is an uniform ambient density in unit of cm −3 .…”
Section: Appendix B Evolution Of Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalization is determined from the total kinetic energy of particles above 1 GeV, W 4 . The emission spectra from such energetic particle distributions can be readily obtained with the relevant emission mechanisms for a uniform emission region with a constant magnetic field (Sturner et al 1997;Kelner et al 2006). This simple emission model neither considers the electron energy losses, which will affect the energy content of energetic electrons, nor addresses the detailed process of particle acceleration, which may be constrained, however, by studying the characteristics of the model parameters (Fan et al 2010).…”
Section: The Mcmc Modeling Of the Emission Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter case would assume strong turbulence and little radio polarization (Stroman & Pohl 2009). Here we chose ξ = π/4 and applied the standard formula for synchrotron emission as for instance used by Sturner et al (1997). The IC emission was calculated using the full Klein-Nishina cross section (Blumenthal & Gould 1970) for relativistic electrons following Sturner et al (1997).…”
Section: Nonthermal Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we chose ξ = π/4 and applied the standard formula for synchrotron emission as for instance used by Sturner et al (1997). The IC emission was calculated using the full Klein-Nishina cross section (Blumenthal & Gould 1970) for relativistic electrons following Sturner et al (1997). As the target photon field for the IC scattering we considered the microwave background only.…”
Section: Nonthermal Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%