2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: An ERP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
264
3
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
24
264
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kanske and Kotz [25] showed that healthy individuals process positive words faster than negative words in a lexical decision task. Our findings are in accordance with studies demonstrating that people generally exhibit higher sensitivity to negative stimuli associated with dangers or threats than to positive stimuli; this phenomenon is known as negative bias [26,27]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, Kanske and Kotz [25] showed that healthy individuals process positive words faster than negative words in a lexical decision task. Our findings are in accordance with studies demonstrating that people generally exhibit higher sensitivity to negative stimuli associated with dangers or threats than to positive stimuli; this phenomenon is known as negative bias [26,27]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Huang and Luo, 2006;Schupp et al, 2004), which are assumed to reflect more elaborate sustained perceptual processing of relevant emotional stimuli, via top-down influences from limbic and/or frontal areas (Eimer et al, 2003;Krolak-Salmon et al, 2001;Sato et al, 2001). Interestingly, we found enhanced P150 and P3 amplitudes for angry faces after cortisol administration only in high avoidant (high BIS) individuals, indicating that processing of angry faces after cortisol administration was specifically enhanced in individuals sensitive to threat.…”
Section: Erp Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…words (Dillon et al, 2006;Herbert et al, 2006;Kanske & Kotz, 2007) or pictures (Huang & Luo, 2006;Keil et al, 2002;Schupp et al, 2007), ranging from 200 to 800 msec. The results of some of these studies are favorable to there being a temporal advantage for the processing of words, whereas others show that pictures are processed earlier.…”
Section: Erp Datamentioning
confidence: 99%