2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11050-012-9088-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the event of the speaker acquiring the relevant evidence for her claim. While the empirical focus is on Bulgarian, this work adds to previous proposals about evidentiality in typologically unrelated languages which aim to derive the intuition of secondary information from the relationship between times/events/situations (see Nikolaeva 1999;Fleck 2007;Speas 2010;Koev 2011;Kalsang et al 2013;Lee 2013;Smirnova 2013). The view of evidentiality as a spatiotemporal distance undermines the claim that evidential sentences in Bulgarian have modal force (see Izvorski 1997;Smirnova 2013) and correctly predicts that speakers are typically committed to the core proposition of the sentence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the event of the speaker acquiring the relevant evidence for her claim. While the empirical focus is on Bulgarian, this work adds to previous proposals about evidentiality in typologically unrelated languages which aim to derive the intuition of secondary information from the relationship between times/events/situations (see Nikolaeva 1999;Fleck 2007;Speas 2010;Koev 2011;Kalsang et al 2013;Lee 2013;Smirnova 2013). The view of evidentiality as a spatiotemporal distance undermines the claim that evidential sentences in Bulgarian have modal force (see Izvorski 1997;Smirnova 2013) and correctly predicts that speakers are typically committed to the core proposition of the sentence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We arrive at the following temporal picture. The proponents of the temporal account make two adjustments to this picture for evidential sentences (see Lee 2013;Smirnova 2013; see also Koev 2011): they introduce a "learning time" (LT) or the time at which the speaker learns the described proposition, and they assume that tense in evidential sentences is anchored to the learning time rather than the speech time. The temporal relation between the learning time and the speech time is determined by the evidential itself, which requires that the learning time precedes or overlaps with the speech time.…”
Section: Background Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the time of evaluation and of the modal coincide, the modal is not necessarily ratificational and can be conjectural. 13 Our account shares some features with Lee's (2012) analysis of Korean evidential -te. Lee has argued that -te expresses that the speaker has sensory information about the described eventuality and that this sensory information is available at the time of utterance.…”
Section: Ratificational Modalitymentioning
confidence: 54%