2000
DOI: 10.1109/27.893314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal characteristics of runaway electrons in electron-neutral collision-dominated plasma of dense gases. Monte Carlo calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An initial assembly of 1 eV electrons ( N 0 = 5000) with velocities unidirectional with the electric force was placed in N 2 gas at ground pressure with applied electric fields of 400 kV/cm, 350 kV/cm, and 325 kV/cm, and simulated for times of t = 1 ns, t = 6 ns, and t = 25 ns, respectively. In accordance with Bakhov et al [2000], the following nitrogen electronic states were considered (see Table 1): A 3 Σ u + (v = 5–9 and v = 10+), B 3 Π g , W 3 Δ u , B ′ 3 Σ u − , C 3 Π u , w 1 Δ u , a 1 Π g , and the sum of the remaining singlet states (threshold ɛ = 13 eV). Elastic and ionization collisions were also considered; however, while ionization was considered as an energy loss mechanism, secondary electrons were not added to the particle assembly.…”
Section: Zero‐dimensional Calculations and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An initial assembly of 1 eV electrons ( N 0 = 5000) with velocities unidirectional with the electric force was placed in N 2 gas at ground pressure with applied electric fields of 400 kV/cm, 350 kV/cm, and 325 kV/cm, and simulated for times of t = 1 ns, t = 6 ns, and t = 25 ns, respectively. In accordance with Bakhov et al [2000], the following nitrogen electronic states were considered (see Table 1): A 3 Σ u + (v = 5–9 and v = 10+), B 3 Π g , W 3 Δ u , B ′ 3 Σ u − , C 3 Π u , w 1 Δ u , a 1 Π g , and the sum of the remaining singlet states (threshold ɛ = 13 eV). Elastic and ionization collisions were also considered; however, while ionization was considered as an energy loss mechanism, secondary electrons were not added to the particle assembly.…”
Section: Zero‐dimensional Calculations and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results for zero‐dimensional modeling of the electron distribution under the influence of a uniform electric field are first presented and compared with existing data. At high electric fields the model is validated by comparisons with studies conducted for N 2 by Tzeng and Kunhardt [1986] and more recently by Bakhov et al [2000]. At low electric fields, model results are compared to available data from swarm experiments in air [ Davies , 1983], numerical solutions of the Boltzmann equation based on the two‐term spherical harmonic expansion of the electron distribution function [ Morgan and Penetrante , 1990], and analytical models proposed by Aleksandrov et al [1995] and Morrow and Lowke [1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because the critical field, E c , is about 10 times larger than the conventional breakdown field (E k = 3 × 10 6 V/m × n) (Moss et al 2006), until relatively recently in 2004, it was not clear whether or not conditions exist in the atmosphere that allow thermal runaway to occur, since such high fields should discharge on very short timescales (Babich 2003;Bakhov et al 2000). When it was established that lightning emits x-rays (Moore et al 2001;, many researchers assumed that this energetic emission was produced by the RREA mechanism acting on cosmic-rays.…”
Section: Thermal Runaway Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of thermal runaway electrons is estimated based on the equation (4) (e.g., Babich et al, 2015;Bakhov et al, 2000).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Energy And The Number Of Thermal Runaway Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where run (E) = 3.5 × 10 −24 exp ( −(2.166 × 10 −7 × E) 2 + 3.77 × 10 −6 × E ) is the runaway electron frequency calculated by a Monte Carlo simulation (Bakhov et al, 2000).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Energy And The Number Of Thermal Runaway Ementioning
confidence: 99%