2014
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.31.00a113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal characteristics of L- and M-cone isolating steady-state electroretinograms

Abstract: Cone isolating stimuli were used to assess the temporal frequency response characteristics of L- and M-cone electroretinograms (ERGs) in nine trichromatic and four dichromatic human observers. The stimuli comprised sinusoidal temporal modulations varying from 5 to 100 Hz. ERGs were recorded using corneal fiber electrodes and subjected to fast Fourier transform analysis. At low temporal frequencies (<10  Hz) the L- and M-cone ERGs had similar amplitude and exhibited minimal differences in apparent latency. At h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The means (6SD) are shown as a function of adaptation time in Figure 6. In agreement with earlier data, the L/M ratios at 12 Hz were smaller than those at 36 Hz, consistent with the notion that the responses reflect luminance activity at 36 Hz and redgreen chromatic activity at 12 Hz (Jacob et al, 2015;Kommanapalli, Murray, Kremers, Parry, & McKeefry, 2014;Kremers & Link, 2008; Kremers et al, 2010; Figure 3. Martins et al, 2016).…”
Section: Changes In L/m Ratios During Adaptationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The means (6SD) are shown as a function of adaptation time in Figure 6. In agreement with earlier data, the L/M ratios at 12 Hz were smaller than those at 36 Hz, consistent with the notion that the responses reflect luminance activity at 36 Hz and redgreen chromatic activity at 12 Hz (Jacob et al, 2015;Kommanapalli, Murray, Kremers, Parry, & McKeefry, 2014;Kremers & Link, 2008; Kremers et al, 2010; Figure 3. Martins et al, 2016).…”
Section: Changes In L/m Ratios During Adaptationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The aim of the present study was to describe lightadaptation processes after extended dark-adaptation for ERG mechanisms that are driven by L-and Mcones and that reflect the activity of cone opponent and luminance postreceptoral pathways (Jacob et al, 2015;Kommanapalli et al, 2014;Kremers & Link, 2008;Kremers et al, 2010;Martins et al, 2016). This study extends the data already available in the literature in several ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It is possible that the responses in the mouse retina are generally more sluggish or more tonic than in humans. The apparent latencies that explain response phases may also be in agreement with this notion [i.e., estimates in mice: 37-39 ms for cone-and rod-driven signals vs. 15-17 ms in humans for 12-60 Hz (Kommanapalli et al 2014;Kremers and Pangeni 2012)]. …”
Section: Comparison Of Retinal Physiology Between Transgenic and Wt Mmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…about 15 Hz, where L-and M-cone responsivities are similar (i.e., a putatively cone opponent mechanism that may reflect parvocellular activity), whereas the other is active at higher temporal frequencies, measurable up to at least 40 Hz (i.e., reflects magnocellularly based luminance activity). This change in mechanism is also reflected in the human response phases (Kommanapalli et al 2014). Mouse responsivities, on the other hand, are larger at low temporal frequencies and decrease strongly above about 14 Hz, being barely measurable at 30 Hz.…”
Section: Comparison Of Retinal Physiology Between Transgenic and Wt Mmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our sampling of temporal frequencies is too coarse to estimate the apparent latencies. In a previous study with FF stimuli it was found that the apparent latencies of L- and M-cone driven ERG signals are very small at intermediate temporal frequencies whereas there are substantial differences at high temporal frequencies [ 18 ] and may cause the large differences between L- and M-cone driven phases at high temporal frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%