2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal characteristics and forecasting of PM2.5 concentration based on historical data in Houston, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average concentration of traffic‐related PM 2.5 at participants’ residential addresses was 0.76 µg/m 3 in our study area. Compared with PM 2.5 concentrations reported in other studies in the same study area, the modeled traffic‐related PM 2.5 concentrations accounted for only 7% to 10% of total concentrations of PM 2.5 but accounted for 71% of primary PM 2.5 emissions . If comparing the average traffic‐related PM 2.5 in our study area with the near‐road gradients of traffic‐related PM 2.5 estimated in our previous study , the 0.76 µg/m 3 was close to the average concentrations at a 50‐m distance from a major road.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The average concentration of traffic‐related PM 2.5 at participants’ residential addresses was 0.76 µg/m 3 in our study area. Compared with PM 2.5 concentrations reported in other studies in the same study area, the modeled traffic‐related PM 2.5 concentrations accounted for only 7% to 10% of total concentrations of PM 2.5 but accounted for 71% of primary PM 2.5 emissions . If comparing the average traffic‐related PM 2.5 in our study area with the near‐road gradients of traffic‐related PM 2.5 estimated in our previous study , the 0.76 µg/m 3 was close to the average concentrations at a 50‐m distance from a major road.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Meanwhile, PM 2.5 modeling techniques vary according to the different predictors applied and objectives. In general, there are four major categories for modeling PM 2.5 : (1) Time series analysis and related statistical analysis (e.g., [16,[51][52][53][54][55]); (2) GTWR and its derivative models (e.g., [30,[56][57][58]); (3) machine learning method using plenty of predictors (e.g., [48,49]); (4) comprehensive approach by integrating several above methods (e.g., [46]). Each method has pros and cons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the 2020 COVID-19 epidemic, human beings have become more aware of their relationship with nature and of the importance of sustaining a harmonious coexistence of man and nature. In a time of significant crises, including the COVID-19 epidemic and climate change, the international community agrees that only through the development and implementation of green and low-carbon technologies, society can achieve high-quality economic recovery [1][2][3]. On Sept. 22, during the General Debate of the 75th Session of the UNGA, Chinese President Xi Jinping declared that China aims to reach CO 2 emissions peak before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%