2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal changes in the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate beneath Eurasia during the late Mesozoic: Geochronological and geochemical evidence from Cretaceous volcanic rocks in eastern NE China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of geophysical and topographic research reveal that the destruction of the NCC occurred mainly in the east of the gravity gradient zone, while the west area still maintains the typical craton essence (Chen, 2010; Chen et al, 2006; Menzies et al, 2007; Xu, 2007; Xu et al, 2008; Zhu et al, 2011), which reflects the westward subduction of the Palaeo‐Pacific Plate beneath NE Asia. The distribution range of Stage 1, Stage 2 and Stage 3 igneous rocks indicates that Cretaceous magmatism gradually migrated eastward from the interior to the continental margin (Figure 11b; Sun, 2016; Tang et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2019), most likely as a result of the eastward drift of Eurasia caused by the continuous retreat of the Palaeo‐Pacific Plate during westward subduction (Sun, 2016; Tang et al, 2018). Moreover, the propagation of extensional fault zones through the overriding crust usually occurs in response to a slab roll‐back geodynamic mechanism (Menant et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of geophysical and topographic research reveal that the destruction of the NCC occurred mainly in the east of the gravity gradient zone, while the west area still maintains the typical craton essence (Chen, 2010; Chen et al, 2006; Menzies et al, 2007; Xu, 2007; Xu et al, 2008; Zhu et al, 2011), which reflects the westward subduction of the Palaeo‐Pacific Plate beneath NE Asia. The distribution range of Stage 1, Stage 2 and Stage 3 igneous rocks indicates that Cretaceous magmatism gradually migrated eastward from the interior to the continental margin (Figure 11b; Sun, 2016; Tang et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2019), most likely as a result of the eastward drift of Eurasia caused by the continuous retreat of the Palaeo‐Pacific Plate during westward subduction (Sun, 2016; Tang et al, 2018). Moreover, the propagation of extensional fault zones through the overriding crust usually occurs in response to a slab roll‐back geodynamic mechanism (Menant et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Histogram of zircon U–Pb ages of Cretaceous magmatism in eastern NE Asia illustrating geodynamic evolution in eastern NE Asia, (b) simplified tectonic divisions of the NE Asia continent (modified after Tang et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2019) and the distribution of Late Cretaceous igneous rocks in the Russian Far East, NE China, SW Japan and South Korea (Data from Wu et al, 2011, and references therein; Xu et al, 2013, and references therein; Tang et al, 2016, Tang et al, 2018, and references therein; Kim et al, 2016, and references therein).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the later period of Middle Triassic quartz diorites could be derived from the partial melting of a thickened lower crust accompanied by the final closure of the PAO. Remarkably, the Late Triassic magmatism consists of a suite of bimodal igneous rocks formed in a post‐orogenic extensional environment after the closure of the PAO along the Dunhua‐Mishan‐Huifahe‐Gudonghe Suture between CAOB and NCC (Figure 11, Cao et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2015; Wu et al, 2011; Xu et al, 2013; Yan et al, 1999). The Late Triassic was the peak metallogenic epoch of the copper–nickel sulphide deposit, represented by the Hongqiling super large copper–nickel sulphide deposit formed 236–208 Ma (Han et al, 2014; Hao et al, 2013; Wei et al, 2013, 2015, 2019; Wu et al, 2004; Xi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
From the Paleozoic to the Mesozoic, the GXR and adjacent areas experienced tectonic transformation and superposition of the Paleo-Asian Ocean tectonic regime, the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean (MOO) tectonic regime, and the Paleo-Pacific Ocean (PPO) tectonic regime, accompanied by complex and multiple structures, magmatism, and mineralization (Xu et al, 2013;Wilde, 2015;Wang et al, 2019Wang et al, , 2022. The GXR is one of the essential magmatic-metallogenic belts in northeast China and offers great resource potential (Deng et al, 2019a;Chen et al, 2021).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%