Temporal changes in the attitude towards smoking bans in public arenas among adults in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2007 to 2010

Lykke, Maja; Helbech, Bodil; Glümer, Charlotte

doi:10.1177/1403494814529034

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the population have positive attitudes towards strict tobacco control policy, even though there is some variation between different population groups, such as men and women. Smoking status groups also differed in their opinions on tobacco control, with never smokers and daily smokers being at the extremes, as shown before (Lykke, Helbech, & Glümer, 2014). One example of this social gradient in the level of acceptance of smoking was the proposition considering smoking on balconies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…It must be noted that non-smokers form a majority of the population and laws need to be aimed at their protection. Smokers are still shown to adapt to and comply with smoke-free laws, which increases approval for smoke-free legislation ( Borland et al, 2006 ; Heloma & Jaakkola, 2003 ; Hyland et al, 2009 ; Lykke et al, 2014 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent studies show that stringent tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries are socially accepted. In Denmark, policy attitudes have changed since the policies were implemented (Lykke, Helbech, & Glümer, 2014), and a large proportion of citizens are ready for more stringent tobacco control policy in terms of future bans on smoking and tax increases (Lykke, Pisinger, & Glümer, 2016). In Norway, compared to daily smokers, non-smokers have more positive attitudes towards new tobacco control measures such as banning smoking in specific outdoor settings and raising the age limit for purchasing cigarettes (Lund, 2016).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Social climate on tobacco control in an advanced tobacco control country

Ruokolainen

Ollila

Patja³

et al. 2018

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social climate on tobacco control in an advanced tobacco control country

Ruokolainen

Ollila

Patja³

et al. 2018

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Stage of policy implementation has been suggested as another factor that may influence policy support [10] as the tobacco context suggests that policies, such as smoking bans in public areas and plain tobacco packaging, become more acceptable after they have been implemented [39][40][41][42]. This could explain the variation in support for policies between countries, if they are at different stages of the policy cycle.…”

Section: Public Support For Policies Between Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Poor diet is a significant contributor to the burden of global disease. There are numerous policies available to address poor diets; however, these policies often require public support to encourage policy action. The current study aimed to understand the level of public support for a range of food policies and the factors associated with policy support. Methods: An online survey measuring support for 13 food policies was completed by 19,857 adults in Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). The proportion of respondents that supported each policy was compared between countries, and the association between demographic characteristics and policy support was analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: The level of support varied between policies, with the highest support for policies that provided incentives (e.g., price subsidies) or information (e.g., calorie labelling on menus), and the lowest support for those that imposed restrictions (e.g., restrictions on sponsorship of sport events). This pattern of support was similar in all countries, but the level differed, with Mexico generally recording the highest support across policies, and the US the lowest. Several demographic characteristics were associated with policy support; however, these relationships varied between countries. Conclusion: The results suggest that support for food policies is influenced by several factors related to the policy design, country, and individual demographic characteristics. Policymakers and advocates should consider these factors when developing and promoting policy options.

show abstract

“…In Italy 93.1 percent of individuals polled supported a total ban compared with 43.7 percent in the Netherlands (Martinez-Sanchez et al, 2010). A survey in Denmark (Lykke et al, 2014) found only 37 percent of surveyed individuals supported such a ban. Among smokers in Ireland, 46 percent were found to support bans in alcohol-serving establishments (Fong et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Public responses to a comprehensive smoking ban

Greenwald

2015

Drugs and Alcohol Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report public reactions to a total workplace smoking ban, including smoking behavior, attendance at bars and clubs, and attitudes toward a broader ban. Design/methodology/approach – Surveys were conducted in two adjacent jurisdictions, one of which instituted a total workplace smoking ban. Surveys took place before (n=1,609) and after (n=1,600) enactment of the ban in the relevant jurisdiction. Findings – No change in smoking prevalence occurred in the jurisdiction enacting the ban. Strong majorities of non-smokers supported the ban, while strong majorities of smokers expressed opposition. In the jurisdiction that enacted the ban, smokers who appeared to be high-volume consumers at bars and clubs were most likely to report reducing attendance at these establishments and to oppose the ban. Research limitations/implications – Surveys depend on accurate self-reporting of behavior and attitudes. Practical implications – Some bars and clubs may incur financial losses due to smoking bans. A core of strong opponents can undermine public consensus regarding smoking bans. Licensing a limited number of bars and clubs to allow smoking can safeguard this consensus. Social implications – Limited smoking bans can serve as a means of harm reduction, as non-smokers are protected from environmental tobacco smoke, and accommodation of smokers reduces their motivation to oppose bans. Originality/value – This investigation makes use of detailed data on the public’s thinking and reactions to a comprehensive smoking ban and is a before-after study with controls.

show abstract

Temporal changes in the attitude towards smoking bans in public arenas among adults in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2007 to 2010

Cited by 10 publications

References 17 publications

Social climate on tobacco control in an advanced tobacco control country

Social climate on tobacco control in an advanced tobacco control country

A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study

Public responses to a comprehensive smoking ban

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About