2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal changes in climatic limitation of tree-growth at upper treeline forests: Contrasted responses along the west-to-east humidity gradient in Northern Patagonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(72 reference statements)
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when photosynthesis decreases in response to light limitation, the leaf internal CO 2 concentration ( c i ) increases, which in turn increases the carbon discrimination against 12 C (Δ 13 C proportional to c i / c a ratio) leading to a decrease of δ 13 C (Farquhar et al, ). This hypothesis is in agreement with the decreasing trend in cloud fraction (−4%) and increasing trend in photosynthetically active radiations (+3.5%) observed in the region over the 1984–2007 period (data retrieved from NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget; see Lavergne et al, ). Thus, in line with the literature, environmental conditions favorable to forest productivity (here, cool summers with less sunlight) result in higher Δ 13 C during carbon assimilation and therefore lower δ 13 C, than do conditions unfavorable to growth (Raczka et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, when photosynthesis decreases in response to light limitation, the leaf internal CO 2 concentration ( c i ) increases, which in turn increases the carbon discrimination against 12 C (Δ 13 C proportional to c i / c a ratio) leading to a decrease of δ 13 C (Farquhar et al, ). This hypothesis is in agreement with the decreasing trend in cloud fraction (−4%) and increasing trend in photosynthetically active radiations (+3.5%) observed in the region over the 1984–2007 period (data retrieved from NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget; see Lavergne et al, ). Thus, in line with the literature, environmental conditions favorable to forest productivity (here, cool summers with less sunlight) result in higher Δ 13 C during carbon assimilation and therefore lower δ 13 C, than do conditions unfavorable to growth (Raczka et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…() and Lavergne et al. (), who compared growth responses in N. pumilio across a precipitation gradient, as well as this study, have led us to assert that trees located in harsh environments, be these dry or cold, should show declines in growth, whereas trees located in more mesic and humid conditions should therefore show an enhancement in growth (for other species showing a positive trend, see Camarero et al., ; Urrutia‐Jalabert et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Site represents the different tree lines, elevation level represents the different sampled elevations from the closed and tall lowest‐elevation forest (E1) to the tree line (E4), calendar year accounts for TRW trends over time, and tree age and DBH control for potential differences in growth trajectories for trees of different age and sizes. In addition, based on prior studies (Alvarez et al., ; Lavergne et al., ), we chose to work with the November–January temperature and precipitation period, which represents the climate conditions during the beginning of the growing season, which have proven to have a direct effect on tree growth, in particular, precipitation. To account for the potentially different patterns in growth trends among sites and elevations, we included interactions among site, elevation and calendar year in the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This processbased model simulates radial growth using the principle of limiting factors and nonlinear growth response functions (Fritts, 2001), and it requires the following as input variables: site latitude, monthly mean temperature, and monthly total precipitation. The VS-Lite model has been used to successfully simulate and evaluate regional patterns of climate limitation of tree growth in a range of environments from semi-arid to temperate and boreal regions (Tolwinski-Ward et al, 2011;Breitenmoser et al, 2014;Lavergne et al, 2015;Mina et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%