2015
DOI: 10.7755/fb.113.3.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal changes in abundance of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) inhabiting the inland waters of Southeast Alaska

Abstract: Abstract-Abundance of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) was estimated from data collected during vessel surveys conducted throughout the inland waters of Southeast Alaska. Line-transect methods were used during 18 seasonal surveys spanning 22 years . Estimates were derived from summer surveys only because of the broader spatial coverage and greater number of surveys during this season than during other seasons. Porpoise abundance varied when different periods were compared (i.e

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature and magnitude of incidental takes are currently unknown but may be significant in some fisheries for Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) and Pacific herring ( Clupea pallasi ) [ 6 ]. Line-transect abundance estimates from the inland waters of southeast Alaska indicated an overall decline in porpoise abundance in the mid-2000s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nature and magnitude of incidental takes are currently unknown but may be significant in some fisheries for Pacific salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) and Pacific herring ( Clupea pallasi ) [ 6 ]. Line-transect abundance estimates from the inland waters of southeast Alaska indicated an overall decline in porpoise abundance in the mid-2000s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Line-transect abundance estimates from the inland waters of southeast Alaska indicated an overall decline in porpoise abundance in the mid-2000s. Contrasting trends between the northern and southern regions of this study area suggest significant population structuring within the currently recognized southeast Alaska stock [ 6 ]. Concern for localized impact on undefined harbour porpoise stocks underscores the need for population genetic analyses to better define population structure; however, sample sizes generated by both strandings and fisheries by-catch are severely limited in key geographical areas, and efforts to supplement these sources with remotely collected tissue biopsies have proved extraordinarily challenging for these small, elusive cetaceans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This citizen science study cost less than $10,000 for the mobile application revisions, field work equipment, and graduate student time; and it covered a spatial area that had only been surveyed several times in Southeast Alaska, yet had never been surveyed for all cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sea otter species [38][39][40][41]. While the Whale mAPP citizen science project received immense positive feedback and can provide inexpensive and potentially useful scientific data, it still has biases and constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, Southeast Alaska offers a potentially ideal location for collecting these data due to a high summer ship-based tourism [37] and marine mammal abundance [3,38,39]. Concurrently, long-term studies describing marine mammal distributions are resource intensive and therefore limited [38][39][40][41], making robust and reliable marine mammal data in this region valuable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that localized harbor porpoise populations show variations in group sizes (Hobbs and Waite , Dahlheim et al . ), ranging patterns (Hobbs and Waite , Haelters et al . , Verfuß et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%