2020
DOI: 10.1111/geb.13233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal biodiversity change following disturbance varies along an environmental gradient

Abstract: AimThe diversity and composition of natural communities are rapidly changing due to anthropogenic disturbances. Magnitude of this compositional reorganization varies across the globe, but reasons behind the variation remain largely unknown. Disturbances induce temporal turnover by stimulating species colonizations, causing local extinctions, altering dominance structure, or all of these. We test which of these processes drive temporal community changes, and whether they are constrained by natural environmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest management effects on turnover and diversity were mostly direct, that is, not mediated by management effects on canopy cover and composition, as evidenced by the small difference between management effects in models that included versus excluded canopy variables. The finding of higher turnover in managed forests agrees with previous studies from boreal forests (Brice et al., 2019; Kaarlejärvi et al., 2021) and other biomes (Barlow et al., 2016; Lake et al., 2000) reporting accelerated biodiversity change following human disturbance. Taken together, our results suggest that species richness changes in vascular plant communities in response to forest management do not seem to be driven by a filtering of species based on plant height or leaf traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Forest management effects on turnover and diversity were mostly direct, that is, not mediated by management effects on canopy cover and composition, as evidenced by the small difference between management effects in models that included versus excluded canopy variables. The finding of higher turnover in managed forests agrees with previous studies from boreal forests (Brice et al., 2019; Kaarlejärvi et al., 2021) and other biomes (Barlow et al., 2016; Lake et al., 2000) reporting accelerated biodiversity change following human disturbance. Taken together, our results suggest that species richness changes in vascular plant communities in response to forest management do not seem to be driven by a filtering of species based on plant height or leaf traits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…not mediated by management effects on canopy cover and composition, as evidenced by the low difference between management effects in models that included vs. excluded canopy variables. The finding of higher turnover in managed forests agrees with previous studies from boreal forests (Brice, Cazelles, Legendre, & Fortin, 2019;Kaarlejärvi, Salemaa, Tonteri, Merilä, & Laine, 2021) and other biomes (Barlow et al, 2016;Lake et al, 2000) reporting accelerated biodiversity change following human disturbance. Taken together, our results suggest that species richness changes in vascular plant communities in response to forest management do not seem to be driven by a filtering of species based on plant height or leaf traits.…”
Section: Land-use and Canopy Dynamics Change The Composition Of Field-layer Vegetationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While some taxa showed stronger rates of turnover in the northernmost zone (birds and moths, in particular), the direction of such trends varied considerably between zones and taxa (see also refs. 23,24 ). Such asynchronous responses are consistent with species emerging as winners or losers, as climate change can either reduce or impose constraints on species fitness, abundance and distributions 8,[11][12][13]25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, future work is needed to determine whether species' niches have expanded, contracted or shifted altogether 32 , and how such responses may eventually translate into changes in abundance 15 or potentially affect species capacity to respond via plasticity or adaptively to climate change. Finally, the observed changes may partly reflect the effects of land-use change 15,24,33 , which may have more direct impacts on species occurrences and community composition. Our approach uses spatial latent variables and thereby accounts for the spatial autocorrelation that may arise from, for example, environmental covariates left unmeasured 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%