2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and spatial variation in garden and street trees in six eastern Australian cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taller trees were more likely to be exotic than native, with nearly half of all gardens (42%) lacking native trees of this size. The mean density of trees (> 5 m high) across properties was 10.0/ha: this is low relative to Australian gardens, where the density of trees (> 4-5 m) in six cities ranged from a low of 56/ha in Hobart to 109/ha in Melbourne (Kirkpatrick et al 2011). Trees may be used to provide shade in Australia, which has a hotter climate than Dunedin, where householders' preference for sun can mitigate against the presence of large trees in close proximity to homes.…”
Section: Tree Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Taller trees were more likely to be exotic than native, with nearly half of all gardens (42%) lacking native trees of this size. The mean density of trees (> 5 m high) across properties was 10.0/ha: this is low relative to Australian gardens, where the density of trees (> 4-5 m) in six cities ranged from a low of 56/ha in Hobart to 109/ha in Melbourne (Kirkpatrick et al 2011). Trees may be used to provide shade in Australia, which has a hotter climate than Dunedin, where householders' preference for sun can mitigate against the presence of large trees in close proximity to homes.…”
Section: Tree Community Compositionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In urban studies, this association, often referred to as the luxury effect (Hope et al 2003), has been documented repeatedly at the household or neighborhood scale, mostly within nontropical cities in developed countries (Chicago: Iverson and Cook 2000;Vancouver: Melles 2005; Phoenix: Hope et al 2003, Martin et al 2004and Tasmania: Kirkpatrick et al 2007) and at least one in a subtropical urban city of a developing country (Bujumbura: Bigirimana et al 2012). Several studies, however, have cautioned that the luxury effect is not necessarily universal, and that under certain circumstances, factors such as the level of formal education, immigration status variation, neighborhood, or housing age may become more relevant than income in determining vegetation management decisions in residential areas (Grove et al 2006, Luck et al 2009, Kirkpatrick et al 2011, Kendal et al 2012. The combined studies argue that the contemporary association between specific socioeconomic factors and urban vegetation at the household scale is necessarily influenced by city-specific socioeconomic conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the effects of urbanization on green space may become increasingly intensive. For example, Kirkpatrick et al (2011) found that the links between socioeconomic conditions and urban tree cover intensified over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%