2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7930-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and spatial variability of instream indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli) and implications for water quality monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the dilution of local effects when data are aggregated to coarser scales is well-established (55, 57). For example, a study of spatial autocorrelation in E. coli levels in the Norwalk River, CT, USA found that signals from point sources were rapidly diluted as water moved downstream, with E. coli levels being ≥90% lower 1,000 m downstream of a potential source than at the source (36). Based on the effective ranges (the distance at which E. coli levels became spatially independent) in the present study, the distance at which dilution occurred varied substantially between waterways and across scales of analysis (again increasing with increasing scale), but was consistently below the 1,000 m reported previously (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, the dilution of local effects when data are aggregated to coarser scales is well-established (55, 57). For example, a study of spatial autocorrelation in E. coli levels in the Norwalk River, CT, USA found that signals from point sources were rapidly diluted as water moved downstream, with E. coli levels being ≥90% lower 1,000 m downstream of a potential source than at the source (36). Based on the effective ranges (the distance at which E. coli levels became spatially independent) in the present study, the distance at which dilution occurred varied substantially between waterways and across scales of analysis (again increasing with increasing scale), but was consistently below the 1,000 m reported previously (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many surveys have reported considerable variability in FIB and sediment levels over space and time (e.g., (13,(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)). For example, Rafi et al (34) found that E. coli levels, and their relationship with watershed size and stream order, varied among three US ecoregions along an East-West gradient (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This matter will be further discussed below. It is in this context noteworthy that Crosby et al ( 2019 ), although over 1900 samples were collected and analyzed between 2007 to 2017, infrequently found elevated bacterial counts during weekly and monthly monitoring. On finer spatial scales, the authors found that less than 25% of the original source concentration was detected at 10 m downstream and less than 10% by 1 km downstream a point source, suggesting that both high density of sampling sites and high frequency sampling may be needed to detect potential sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Hence, the source of E. coli could be sufficiently far away from the sampling location to allow for complete mixing across the river section. In their investigation of the Norwalk river (Connecticut), Crosby et al ( 2019 ) also found minimal fluctuations of the bacterial concentrations at the sub-hourly and hourly timescales at each sampling point. The author’s conclusion that sampling from either side of the river results in comparable detection likelihoods was, however, not fully supported by our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation