“…Despite the aforementioned caveats of characterizing diurnal cycles of fire activity from geostationary sensors, modern applications are using high-frequency observations of active fire pixel counts [19], sub-pixel active fire area (e.g., [20]), and fire radiative power, FRP (e.g., [15,21]), to generate diurnal cycles of trace gas and aerosol emission fluxes (e.g., [22]) and smoke injection heights (e.g., [23,24]), which when input into atmospheric transport models can be used to forecast plume dispersion and air quality (e.g., [25,26]). As cautioned by Eva and Lambin [8], however, a failure to understand the accuracy and limitations of satellite-based fire products could lead to improper interpretations of the spatiotemporal pattern of biomass burning (e.g., [27,28]) and flawed estimates of fuel consumption and smoke production (e.g., [29,30]).…”