Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Coupling Coordination Degree of Industrial Innovation Ecosystem—From the Perspective of Green Transformation

Abstract

This paper takes the industrial innovation ecosystem as the research object and the realization of green development as the goal, discussing the temporal and spatial evolution of coupling coordination degree of industrial innovation ecosystem from the perspective of system view. Based on the data of 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2021, the spatial and temporal pattern distribution and spatial connection evolution of synergy among the three subsystems of industrial innovation ecosystem are studied by using coupling coordination degree model, trend surface model and gravity model. It is found that during the study period, the coupling relationship between the three subsystems is in a dynamic upward state. The regions with high values and rapid growth are distributed in the key areas of the national economic development strategy. At the same time, they have the characteristics of “positive U-shaped first and then inverted U-shaped” in the east-west and north-south directions; the spatial connection strength of coupling coordination degree shows that the spatial connection strength of the eastern region is significantly greater than that of the western region. With the improvement of spatial connection strength, a radial coupling network centered on Beijing Tianjin Tangshan region and the Yangtze River Delta is formed, which is of core significance to promote the coordinated development of industrial innovation ecosystem.

Green innovation ecosystem and water performance in the food service industry: The effects of environmental management controls and digitalization

“…First, drawing upon the overlapping boundaries (Fan et al, 2022) of the research on GI and IEs (Nylund et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2021; Zou et al, 2021), we advance the knowledge regarding the role of the GIE in environmental sustainability (Zeng et al, 2022). Specifically, our analysis addresses a research gap in relation to the salient dynamics within the GIE (Fan et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2022; Liu & Stephens, 2019; Oliveira‐Duarte et al, 2021; Yi & Zhang, 2022; Yin et al, 2020; Yu et al, 2022). A multiagent cooperation perspective is adopted to examine both the roles of and interactions among GIE actors.…”

“…The GIE is an innovation ecosystem (IE) that seeks to improve the conditions that support GI (Zeng et al, 2022). While several scholars have recently stressed that further attention should be given to the GIE (e.g., Fan et al, 2022; Liu et al, 2022; Liu & Stephens, 2019; Oliveira‐Duarte et al, 2021; Yi & Zhang, 2022; Yin et al, 2020; Yu et al, 2022), few quantitative studies have addressed the GIE in the management literature. Specifically, there is limited empirical evidence on how and to what extent the GIE can assist firms in pursuing environmental goals, such as water performance (Zeng et al, 2022).…”

Measuring the Development Capability of the Innovation Ecosystem from a Quadruple Helix Perspective—An Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data for Chinese High-Tech Industries

“…Some scholars study the relationships between innovation entities in the industrial innovation ecosystem [45,46] and the context division in the interaction process of the entities, including bilateral relationships, the industrial background, and the whole industrial ecosystem at different levels [47,48]. In recent years, studies on the construction, evolution mechanism, and coordinated development stability of industrial innovation ecosystems have gradually emerged, and some scholars have proposed the concept of architects [49] and studied how the change of the framework and the evolution of its strategic behavior promote the formation and evolution of the industrial innovation ecosystem [1]; solved the contradiction between economic development, energy shortages, and environmental deterioration by constructing and exploring the evolution mechanism of the industrial innovation ecosystem in resource-based cities [50]; and studied the spatiotemporal evolution of the coupling coordination degree of the industrial innovation ecosystem in order to achieve green development [51]. From the perspective of the industrial innovation ecosystem, on study also analyzed how the solar photovoltaic industry obtains competitive advantages through the construction of industrial innovation ecosystems and the maintenance of industrial innovation ecological relationships [52].…”

Research on the Coupling Coordination Degree of Triple Helix of Government Guidance, Industrial Innovation and Scientific Research Systems: Evidence from China

“…The relevant indicators of government guidance mainly refer to the research of Cheng et al [31] and Sun et al [32]. The relevant indicators of industrial innovation mainly refer to the research of Li et al [33] and Yu et al [34]. The relevant indicators of scientific research mainly refer to the research of Wang et al [35] and Zhang et al [36].…”