2015
DOI: 10.1128/aem.04054-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and Spatial Differences in Microbial Composition during the Manufacture of a Continental-Type Cheese

Abstract: We sought to determine if the time, within a production day, that a cheese is manufactured has an influence on the microbial community present within that cheese. To facilitate this, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was used to elucidate the microbial community dynamics of brine-salted continental-type cheese in cheeses produced early and late in the production day. Differences in the microbial composition of the core and rind of the cheese were also investigated. Throughout ripening, it was apparent that cheeses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in milk samples from cows that were not subjected to teat prep, Gram-positive and gut-associated genera, such as Ruminococcus, Eremococcus, and Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis, were more prevalent in indoor than in outdoor samples, and uncultured Corynebacteriales were more prevalent in indoor than in outdoor samples. Ruminococcus and Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis are both gut-associated genera, although, from a dairy perspective, Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis has previously been found in continental-type cheese (17), and Ruminococcus has been detected in raw milk (18), and in the present study these organisms were detected in higher proportions in INP (no prep indoors) milk than in ONP (no prep outdoors) milk. While relatively little is known about the uncultured Corynebacteriales, the cultured equivalent contains species known to cause mastitis (19), as well as other species that are found on the surfaces of surface-ripened cheese (20).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For instance, in milk samples from cows that were not subjected to teat prep, Gram-positive and gut-associated genera, such as Ruminococcus, Eremococcus, and Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis, were more prevalent in indoor than in outdoor samples, and uncultured Corynebacteriales were more prevalent in indoor than in outdoor samples. Ruminococcus and Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis are both gut-associated genera, although, from a dairy perspective, Ruminococcaceae Incertae Sedis has previously been found in continental-type cheese (17), and Ruminococcus has been detected in raw milk (18), and in the present study these organisms were detected in higher proportions in INP (no prep indoors) milk than in ONP (no prep outdoors) milk. While relatively little is known about the uncultured Corynebacteriales, the cultured equivalent contains species known to cause mastitis (19), as well as other species that are found on the surfaces of surface-ripened cheese (20).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, milk supplied to the farm is not always immediately processed. In particular, the storage conditions and storage time before the processing can favor the growth and the development of minor microbiota which can become dominant, leading to unacceptable quality of the final dairy product (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, the microbiota was related to raw material origin (Bokulich et al ., 2014a; Rizzello et al ., 2015) or quality (Dolci et al ., 2014; O'Sullivan et al ., 2015; Alessandria et al ., 2016), as well as to development of flavour‐impact compounds (De Pasquale et al ., 2014a, 2016; De Filippis et al ., 2016a). Moreover, food‐related environments were found to harbour a resident microbiota, beneficially involved in dairy (Bokulich and Mills, 2013a; Stellato et al ., 2015; Calasso et al ., 2016), alcoholic (Bokulich et al ., 2012a, 2014b) and sourdough (Minervini et al ., 2015) fermentations, although the presence of potential spoilers was also emphasized in some cases (Bokulich et al ., 2015a; Stellato et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Monitoring Microbes In Food Fermentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%