2005
DOI: 10.1175/jam2251.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and Spatial Changes of the Agroclimate in Alberta, Canada, from 1901 to 2002

Abstract: This paper analyzes the long-term temporal trends in the agroclimate of Alberta, Canada, and explores the spatial variations of the agroclimatic resources and the potential crop-growing area in Alberta. Nine agroclimatic parameters are investigated: May-August precipitation (PCPN), the start of growing season (SGS), the end of the growing season (EGS), the length of the growing season (LGS), the date of the last spring frost (LSF), the date of the first fall frost (FFF), the length of the frost-free period (F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter result is consistent with an agroclimatological study by Shen et al . (), who reported an 8% increase in May to August precipitation for Alberta over 1901 to 2002, and that the trends were not spatially uniform across the province.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The latter result is consistent with an agroclimatological study by Shen et al . (), who reported an 8% increase in May to August precipitation for Alberta over 1901 to 2002, and that the trends were not spatially uniform across the province.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For the Canadian province of Alberta, Shen et al (2005) found no significant long-term changes in GSS, GSE, or GSL (>5…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to Shen et al (2005), the root meansquare errors of the daily township precipitation data ranged from 1Ð8 to 2Ð8 mm and for the daily maximum and minimum air temperature 1Ð4-3Ð2°C and 1Ð8-3Ð2°C, respectively. When daily data were converted to monthly values and cross-checked for accuracy against the observed monthly data obtained from Environment Canada (Table II and Figure 4), the errors in the interpolated monthly precipitation data ranged from 5Ð2 to 8Ð1 mm, while the biases were between 12 and 10Ð5%.…”
Section: Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%