Temporal and Social Comparisons in Performance Evaluation Scale

Chun, Jinseok S.; Brockner, Joel; Cremer, David De

doi:10.1037/t67005-000

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, people wind up having certain expectations about the algorithms used in AI and may have aversive reactions to AI's non‐human nature (Burton et al., 2020). In the context of recruitment, the use of AI to analyze prospective job candidates is perceived by applicants as less procedurally just (Acikgoz et al., 2020) and less interpersonally just (Chun & De Cremer, 2022). To make matters worse, striving to foster informational justice about the use of AI may backfire, as transparency works better for human decision makers than for algorithmic agents (Newman et al., 2020) and the type of explanations offered for AI have their own impact on fairness perceptions (Van Berkel et al., 2021).…”

Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in Personnel Psychology

Colquitt

Hill

Cremer

2022

Personnel Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We provide a review of progress in the field of organizational justice, paying special attention to articles published in Personnel Psychology. We begin by describing the foundation of the literature, where work linked adherence to distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice rules to employee cognitions, emotions, behaviors, and well‐being. We then turn to the extensions that marked the next stage of the literature's evolution, including justice climate, third‐party perspectives, and justice enactment–where managerial motives, characteristics, and context are cast as predictors of justice rule adherence. Next, we move to suggestions for future research, including manager‐based outcomes of justice rule adherence, more explicit integrations with the social justice literature, and gaining a better understanding of the fairness of artificial intelligence systems. We close with the practical implications of the justice literature, many of which have been informed by advancements in the pages of Personnel Psychology.

show abstract