2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.12.945436
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and genetic variation in female aggression after mating

Abstract: AbstractAggression between individuals of the same sex is almost ubiquitous across the animal kingdom. Winners of intrasexual contests often garner considerable fitness benefits, through greater access to mates, food, or social dominance. In females, aggression is often tightly linked to reproduction, with females displaying increases in aggressive behavior when mated, gestating or lactating, or when protecting dependent offspring. In the fruit fly, Drosophila mela… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If they had shown an intermediate response, this would be more consistent with a dose‐dependent effect. The idea of an ‘on–off’ switch is consistent with another study which found that different genotypes of males do not stimulate different levels of post‐mating aggression in females, despite potential differences in their ejaculates (Bath et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they had shown an intermediate response, this would be more consistent with a dose‐dependent effect. The idea of an ‘on–off’ switch is consistent with another study which found that different genotypes of males do not stimulate different levels of post‐mating aggression in females, despite potential differences in their ejaculates (Bath et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Across taxa, female aggression can have substantial fitness consequences, with winners in intrasexual aggressive encounters garnering considerable fitness benefits, in the form of increased access to food, better nesting or oviposition sites, protection of their offspring or social dominance (Clutton‐Brock & Huchard, 2013; Rosvall, 2011). In D. melanogaster , mated females spend twice as much time engaging in aggressive interactions as virgin females when competing over food (Bath et al., 2017, 2020; Nilsen et al., 2004). Like other post‐mating responses (PMRs), increased female aggression after mating is stimulated by components of the male ejaculate in this species—females must receive sperm to maximally increase aggression post mating, while the Sfp ‘sex peptide’ is also partially responsible for the increase in aggression after mating (Bath et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in female Drosophila aggression has focused on competition over territory, that is, where two females are fighting over a physical patch of food. Interestingly, in that context mated females are more aggressive than virgin females 31,32,37 , in stark opposition with our own findings in the context of mate competition. This reversal in the relationship between mating status and aggression levels could be due to a shift in the females’ perceived value of available resources: virgin females would value mating partners higher than egg-laying sites, whereas mated females would then prioritize egg-laying site acquisition over possible early rematings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We explored how reproductive parameters are affected by aggression and found no clear effect on any of the measured parameters. We show that the amount of aggression displayed in these circumstances has a positive correlation with the female mating drive, which is the opposite of what had previously been reported for food patch competition 31,32 . Finally, we show that food odour is a pre-requisite for these aggressive displays and that conspecific sensing through the odorant receptor OR47b contributes substantially to generate aggressive displays.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation