2016
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal and environmental influences on long-distance calling by free-ranging maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the multiple negative effects of wind on signal propagation and reception it is probable that lions actively avoid vocalising during these periods as doing so would result in minimal benefit. Similar avoidance behaviour has been recorded for maned wolves (Rocha et al, 2016) and timber wolves (Joslin, 1967). In addition to the effects of wind speed, our results also indicated significant effects for temperature and absolute humidity with lions showing an apparent preference for vocalising in lower temperatures and higher humidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Considering the multiple negative effects of wind on signal propagation and reception it is probable that lions actively avoid vocalising during these periods as doing so would result in minimal benefit. Similar avoidance behaviour has been recorded for maned wolves (Rocha et al, 2016) and timber wolves (Joslin, 1967). In addition to the effects of wind speed, our results also indicated significant effects for temperature and absolute humidity with lions showing an apparent preference for vocalising in lower temperatures and higher humidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%