2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

temponest: a Bayesian approach to pulsar timing analysis

Abstract: A new Bayesian software package for the analysis of pulsar timing data is presented in the form of TempoNest which allows for the robust determination of the non-linear pulsar timing solution simultaneously with a range of additional stochastic parameters. This includes both red spin noise and dispersion measure variations using either power law descriptions of the noise, or through a model-independent method that parameterises the power at individual frequencies in the signal. We use TempoNest to show that at… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
199
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also the possibility that the DMs measured for the observed epochs do not agree between the sites due to the difference in observing frequencies used and spatial location; the two data sets may essentially be sampling a different ISM due to multipath scattering . Lentati et al (2016) apply a Fourier-based method of DM estimation (see also Lentati et al 2014) that allows for robust correction of DM variations during epochs without multifrequency data in the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA) data release (Verbiest et al 2016). The DM noise model used by Lentati et al (2016) assumes the power spectrum of the variations is in the form of a frequency-dependent power law.…”
Section: Linear Trends and Annual Periodicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also the possibility that the DMs measured for the observed epochs do not agree between the sites due to the difference in observing frequencies used and spatial location; the two data sets may essentially be sampling a different ISM due to multipath scattering . Lentati et al (2016) apply a Fourier-based method of DM estimation (see also Lentati et al 2014) that allows for robust correction of DM variations during epochs without multifrequency data in the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA) data release (Verbiest et al 2016). The DM noise model used by Lentati et al (2016) assumes the power spectrum of the variations is in the form of a frequency-dependent power law.…”
Section: Linear Trends and Annual Periodicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common method is to adjust the values until the reduced-χ 2 of the fitted model reaches unity. Bayesian and other maximum likelihood methods have also recently been developed and applied to precision pulsar timing datasets (van Haasteren et al 2009;Lentati et al 2014). In these methods, EFAC and EQUAD are included as nuisance parameters and marginalised when calculating the posterior distributions of parameters of interest or comparing models.…”
Section: Including Jitter Noise In Timing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has now been used to determine the proper motion of millisecond pulsars (Reardon et al 2016). Lentati (2014) demonstrated a similar method in which the noise properties of the data and the pulsar parameters were simultaneously determined using a Bayesian methodology (Desvignes et al 2016). Recently Babak (2016) described the comparison of noise models from Bayesian and frequentist methods and got the consistent upper limits on continuous gravitational waves depended on the two algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%