1990
DOI: 10.1101/gad.4.4.536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Templated insertions in the rearranged chicken IgL V gene segment arise by intrachromosomal gene conversion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although receptor revision by gene conversion has been suggested to operate in some species (26,27), evidence that this nonreciprocal exchange can alter the reading frame in CDR3 has not been shown. Although intriguing, our recovery of nearly 100% IF rearrangements is not unique and was previously reported in chickens (9) and rabbits (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although receptor revision by gene conversion has been suggested to operate in some species (26,27), evidence that this nonreciprocal exchange can alter the reading frame in CDR3 has not been shown. Although intriguing, our recovery of nearly 100% IF rearrangements is not unique and was previously reported in chickens (9) and rabbits (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to chicken Ig genes, where a pool of pseudogenes is maintained for diversification through gene conversion (12,13), it seems unlikely that the chicken CD8␣-like gene cluster is retained simply to act as a reservoir for CD8␣ gene conversion. It should be noted that in the annotated chicken genome database (GenBank locus NW_060360) and the corresponding article (14), the CD8␣-like sequences were described as genes encoding products similar to CD8␣ precursors or as five additional copies of the CD8␣ gene, respectively.…”
Section: Cd8␣ and Cd8␤ Bracket A Family Of Novel Multigenes Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strikingly, Sale and colleagues [12 •• ] found that chicken DT40 cell subclones that were defective for various molecules involved in the repair of breaks via homologous recombination (XRCC2, XRCC3 and RAD51B) underwent significantly higher rates of somatic hypermutation than gene conversion. Considering that gene conversion, like hypermutation, requires a rearranged V(D)J (the acceptor), and that transcription or transcription-related sequences are necessary [32], it appears likely that Ig hypermutation and gene conversion share both the targeting phase and the introduction of DNA breaks. The mechanism utilized to process those breaks, however, probably differs between the two mechanisms -perhaps one (gene conversion) utilizing a pseudogene and the other (hypermutation) utilizing a sister chromatid as donors, during break repair via homologous recombination [12 •• ].…”
Section: Introduction Of Dna Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%