2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0136-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Template-free 2D particle fusion in localization microscopy

Abstract: Methods that fuse multiple localization microscopy images of a single structure can improve signal-to-noise ratio and resolution, but they generally suffer from template bias or sensitivity to registration errors. We present a template-free particle-fusion approach based on an all-to-all registration that provides robustness against individual misregistrations and underlabeling. We achieved 3.3-nm Fourier ring correlation (FRC) image resolution by fusing 383 DNA origami nanostructures with 80% labeling density… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
113
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the error range of PAINT data at 30% DOL. Consistent with our previous work therefore, 12 we observe that STORM imaging requires a higher DOL than PAINT to achieve a similar performance. The simulations also indicate that a highquality reconstruction (error <10 nm) requires at least 50-100 particles (Figure 1d) for PAINT data with 50% DOL.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the error range of PAINT data at 30% DOL. Consistent with our previous work therefore, 12 we observe that STORM imaging requires a higher DOL than PAINT to achieve a similar performance. The simulations also indicate that a highquality reconstruction (error <10 nm) requires at least 50-100 particles (Figure 1d) for PAINT data with 50% DOL.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our earlier work 12 , we kept all initially picked particles for the final super-particle. We only removed many of the bad registrations from the all-to-all matrix as long as the graph stays connected.…”
Section: Outlier Particle Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At this scale, colocalization does not exist and is replaced by the measurement of distances between the localizations of different species (Georgieva et al, 2016;Lagache et al, 2018;Pageon et al, 2016). A recent development in SMLM analysis is the use of single particle averaging to reach molecular details beyond image resolution by averaging multiple similar objects (Broeken et al, 2015;Heydarian et al, 2018;Laine et al, 2015;Salas et al, 2017;Sieben et al, 2018a). A detailed review of the available algorithms and software is beyond the scope of the present article, but we encourage the interested reader to explore this very dynamic area that constitutes the next logical step toward leveraging SMLM possibilities.…”
Section: Analysis Of Smlm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%