2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja023729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature variations in the dayside magnetosheath and their dependence on ion‐scale magnetic structures: THEMIS statistics and measurements by MMS

Abstract: The magnetosheath contains an array of waves, instabilities, and nonlinear magnetic structures which modify global plasma properties by means of various wave‐particle interactions. The present work demonstrates that ion‐scale magnetic field structures (∼0.2–0.5 Hz) observed in the dayside magnetosheath are statistically correlated to ion temperature changes on orders 10–20% of the background value. In addition, our statistical analysis implies that larger temperature changes are in equipartition to larger ampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ions can be heated more efficiently in the downstream of the quasi‐parallel bow shock due to a variety of wave modes, wave‐particle interactions (Blanco‐Cano et al., 2006; Eastwood et al., 2002, 2003, 2005), instabilities, and reconnection in thin current sheets (Karimabadi et al., 2014; Retinò et al., 2007; Sundkvist et al., 2007), which eventually can contribute to the dawn‐dusk asymmetric proton temperature in the dayside magnetosheath (Dimmock et al., 2015; Dimmock, Osmane, et al., 2017). However, the observed level of dawn‐favored temperature asymmetry in the magnetosheath is only 10–20% and thus smaller than the 30–40% asymmetry of the cold component ions observed in the plasma sheet (Wing et al., 2005), indicating that other mechanisms, either those at the magnetopause or magnetosphere, further contribute to the dawn‐favored plasma sheet asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ions can be heated more efficiently in the downstream of the quasi‐parallel bow shock due to a variety of wave modes, wave‐particle interactions (Blanco‐Cano et al., 2006; Eastwood et al., 2002, 2003, 2005), instabilities, and reconnection in thin current sheets (Karimabadi et al., 2014; Retinò et al., 2007; Sundkvist et al., 2007), which eventually can contribute to the dawn‐dusk asymmetric proton temperature in the dayside magnetosheath (Dimmock et al., 2015; Dimmock, Osmane, et al., 2017). However, the observed level of dawn‐favored temperature asymmetry in the magnetosheath is only 10–20% and thus smaller than the 30–40% asymmetry of the cold component ions observed in the plasma sheet (Wing et al., 2005), indicating that other mechanisms, either those at the magnetopause or magnetosphere, further contribute to the dawn‐favored plasma sheet asymmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test particle simulation agrees well with the hybrid simulation at the early nonlinear stage; however, there is large deviation in the vortex region at the later nonlinear stage. This anisotropic temperature is likely to driven small-scale kinetic waves (e.g., mirror modes and ion cyclotron waves; Dimmock et al, 2015;Dimmock et al, 2017;Nykyri et al, 2003;Nykyri et al, 2011) and secondary instabilities (e.g., firehose instability). Note in Figure 4, these two simulations have similar 3 ∕ 1 value in the vortex region, meaning this deviation may be attributed to the different magnetic field directions in fluid and hybrid simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimmock et al () statistically examined the relationship between the ion temperature and magnetic field fluctuations in the dayside magnetosheath and their bow shock geometry dependence. Their results led to the conclusion that the amplitude in the ion temperature variations observed in the quasi‐parallel magnetosheath is larger than that in the quasi‐perpendicular magnetosheath due to the small‐scale magnetic field fluctuations generated by the turbulence or foreshock effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%