2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-size rule is mediated by thermal plasticity of critical size inDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Most ectotherms show an inverse relationship between developmental temperature and body size, a phenomenon known as the temperature-size rule (TSR). Several competing hypotheses have been proposed to explain its occurrence. According to one set of views, the TSR results from inevitable biophysical effects of temperature on the rates of growth and differentiation, whereas other views suggest the TSR is an adaptation that can be achieved by a diversity of mechanisms in different taxa. Our data reveal that the fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
113
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(134 reference statements)
5
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This result is the complete opposite pattern from that observed in M. sexta and D. melanogaster, which delay metamorphosis if starved below the critical weight (20,22,23,30,35,51,52). While the effects of provision treatment (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 2,928.34, P < 0.0001), body mass (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 121.2, P < 0.0001), and their interaction (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 30.1, P < 0.0001) all weighed heavily on the duration of growth until the prepupal stage, two key problems made the determination of critical weight in O. lignaria untenable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1). This result is the complete opposite pattern from that observed in M. sexta and D. melanogaster, which delay metamorphosis if starved below the critical weight (20,22,23,30,35,51,52). While the effects of provision treatment (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 2,928.34, P < 0.0001), body mass (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 121.2, P < 0.0001), and their interaction (ANOVA, F 1,185 = 30.1, P < 0.0001) all weighed heavily on the duration of growth until the prepupal stage, two key problems made the determination of critical weight in O. lignaria untenable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…1). We observed no larval body mass at which the timing of growth cessation became invariant with respect to food removal, as expected with other critical weights for metamorphosis (20,22,23,30,35,51,52). Second, instead of starvation delaying development, excess feeding delayed development (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations