2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00506-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effects on ecosystem carbon budget: nonlinearity begets surprises

Abstract: Nonlinearity is a salient feature in all complex systems, and it certainly characterizes biogeochemical cycles in ecosystems across a wide range of scales. Soil carbon emission is a major source of uncertainty in estimating the terrestrial carbon budget at the ecosystem level and above. Due to the lack of consideration of the nonlinearity in temperature sensitivity of soil respiration, several commonly used ecosystem models produce substantially different estimates of soil respiration with the same or similar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
82
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
82
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have attempted to regress R S against a wide range of biotic and abiotic variables, but the results vary tremendously across ecosystems and biomes (Del Grosso et al, 2005;Raich and Schlesinger, 1992;Reichstein et al, 2003). These correlations also raise the possibility of estimating R S , with an associated error range, from airborne and satellite observations; the lack of such large-scale, observation-driven R S estimates is a major problem in constraining regional-to global-scale C fluxes (Qi et al, 2002;Rayner et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2003).…”
Section: Observed Annual Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to regress R S against a wide range of biotic and abiotic variables, but the results vary tremendously across ecosystems and biomes (Del Grosso et al, 2005;Raich and Schlesinger, 1992;Reichstein et al, 2003). These correlations also raise the possibility of estimating R S , with an associated error range, from airborne and satellite observations; the lack of such large-scale, observation-driven R S estimates is a major problem in constraining regional-to global-scale C fluxes (Qi et al, 2002;Rayner et al, 2005;Jones et al, 2003).…”
Section: Observed Annual Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been confirmed by Schindlbacher et al (2010), who measured respiration in incubated soil samples and showed that the Lloyd-Taylor and Gaussian formulations had an increasing temperature sensitivity along elevation gradients in Spain and Austria. Nevertheless, in our study the Exponential formulation was included in the analysis because the usage of Q 10 values is common (Qi et al, 2002).…”
Section: Fit Of the Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from its large quantity, SR is exponentially related to soil temperature which has dramatically increased during the last three decades, and will continue to increase in this century (IPCC 2007) in most ecosystems (e.g., Xu and Qi 2001b;Sampson et al 2007). Other factors can also profoundly influence SR, such as soil quality (soil organic carbon), nitrogen deposition, climate conditions and human disturbance (Qi et al 2002;Mo et al 2007). Among all factors, Jones et al (2003) suggested that climate change, particularly rising temperature, was the major cause of increasing SR. Q 10 of SR under temperature T defined as SR T+10 /SR T , where SR T was soil respiration under soil temperature of T°C (Pang et al 2013), was used to describe the sensitivity of SR to temperature, and was usually estimated based on empirical functions (e.g., exponential equation) between soil temperature and SR (Lloyd and Taylor 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%