2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in two boreal forest soil profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
68
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
14
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is explicable that the original hydrophobicity of the manure has a potentially important effect on initiation of SOM decomposition in the amended samples. According to chemical kinetic theory, decomposition of recalcitrant organic substrates has higher activation energy (Karhu et al, 2010, and references therein). Hydrophobic organic compounds that are considered to be recalcitrant (González-Pérez et al, 2002) would require higher activation energy, and thereby can slow down the initiation of the organic matter decomposition process in originally hydrophobic CE amended samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is explicable that the original hydrophobicity of the manure has a potentially important effect on initiation of SOM decomposition in the amended samples. According to chemical kinetic theory, decomposition of recalcitrant organic substrates has higher activation energy (Karhu et al, 2010, and references therein). Hydrophobic organic compounds that are considered to be recalcitrant (González-Pérez et al, 2002) would require higher activation energy, and thereby can slow down the initiation of the organic matter decomposition process in originally hydrophobic CE amended samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, with increasing soil depth, organic matter becomes increasingly chemically recalcitrant (Rumpel et al 2002;Lorenz and Lal 2005;Spielvogel et al 2008). Therefore, the temperature sensitivity of SOC decomposition should theoretically increase with depth (Lomander et al 1998;Fierer et al 2003;Karhu et al 2010). However, our results did not support this prediction, suggesting mechanisms other than chemical recalcitrance are needed to explain our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous studies have shown inconsistent patterns of Q 10 values of soil respiration with soil depth. Increase (Lomander et al 1998;Fierer et al 2003;Jin et al 2008;Karhu et al 2010), decrease (Winkler et al 1996;MacDonald et al 1999;Gillabel et al 2010), or no changes (Fang et al 2005;Leifeld and Fuhrer 2005;Rey et al 2008) in apparent Q 10 values with increasing soil depth have been observed in different studies. Much of the variation in the apparent temperature sensitivity of SOC decomposition may be related to the fact that labile substrate availability is often unaccounted for in these studies Gershenson et al 2009;Conant et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At coniferous sites the amount of recalcitrant material is higher (Landsberg and Gower, 1997;Wang et al, 2006) than at all other sites investigated. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration increases with substrate recalcitrance as long as environmental constraints are not limiting decomposition (Conant et al, 2008;Hartley and Ineson, 2008;Karhu et al, 2010;Lützow and Kögel-Knabner, 2009;Zimmermann and Bird, 2012) because of the higher number of steps needed for decomposition of more complex substrates. Also, according to kinetic theory, the temperature sensitivity of decomposition increases with increasing molecular complexity of the substrate due to the higher activation energy of recalcitrant substrates (Hartley and Ineson, 2008;Vanhala et al, 2008).…”
Section: Temperature Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%