2011
DOI: 10.1128/jb.05868-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-Sensitive Mutants of RNase E in Salmonella enterica

Abstract: RNase E has an important role in mRNA turnover and stable RNA processing, although the reason for its essentiality is unknown. We isolated conditional mutants of RNase E to provide genetic tools to probe its essential function. In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, an extreme slow-growth phenotype caused by mutant EF-Tu (Gln125Arg, tufA499) can be rescued by mutants of RNase E that have reduced activity. We exploited this phenotype to select mutations in RNase E and screened these for temperature sensiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we addressed whether the degradation of one or more mRNAs might be an additional essential activity of RNase E. We previously isolated temperature‐sensitive Salmonella mutants with altered rne alleles that have a major effect on mRNA degradation at the non‐permissive temperature (Hammarlof et al ., ). The approach we took here was to identify external suppressors of these ts mutations in the expectation that their identity would reveal important insights into the essential functions of RNase E. Among 15 independent external suppressors that we isolated, the majority mapped within relBE whose only known activity is mRNA cleavage within the ribosomal A‐site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here we addressed whether the degradation of one or more mRNAs might be an additional essential activity of RNase E. We previously isolated temperature‐sensitive Salmonella mutants with altered rne alleles that have a major effect on mRNA degradation at the non‐permissive temperature (Hammarlof et al ., ). The approach we took here was to identify external suppressors of these ts mutations in the expectation that their identity would reveal important insights into the essential functions of RNase E. Among 15 independent external suppressors that we isolated, the majority mapped within relBE whose only known activity is mRNA cleavage within the ribosomal A‐site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We had previously identified four different rne mutations in Salmonella with a conditional lethal phenotype (temperature-sensitivity, ts) associated with a major reduction in mRNA turnover at the non-permissive temperature (Hammarlof et al 2011). Because these ts mutations were also associated with some (relatively minor) defects in rRNA and tRNA processing we could not draw any definitive conclusion regarding which of the RNase E activities were essential.…”
Section: Selecting Suppression Of Conditional Lethalitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We isolated approximately 80 independent mutants capable of growth at the non-permissive temperature. Most of these carried second-site (intragenic) mutations in rne that compensated for the effect of the original ts mutation on structure-function relationships within RNase E (Hammarlof et al 2011). However, we also identified 15 independent mutants (selected to suppress rne-6 and rne-9, two of the four ts mutations) that retained the original ts allele in rne and carried in addition an external mutation that suppressed the conditional lethal phenotype (Hammarlof et al 2015).…”
Section: Selecting Suppression Of Conditional Lethalitymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the endoribonuclease RNase E is essential for cell viability in Escherichia coli 5–7 where roles in mRNA decay and the maturation of tRNA and rRNA have been well documented [reviewed in 1 and 8 ]. RNase E is also required for cell viability in Salmonella enterica 9 and has been implicated in the pathogenicity of both S. enterica and Yersinia pestis 10,11 . Furthermore, since homologues of RNase E are predicted to be present in many bacteria 12 , including pathogenic species, but are not found in animals or humans, RNase E is an ideal potential antibacterial target 24,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%