2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification

Abstract: Because differences in the phacoemulsification settings can lead to temperature elevations in the anterior chamber, surgeons must carefully monitor these settings to prevent corneal tissue damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DMEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty (Dick et al 1996;D ıaz-Valle et al 1998;Walkow et al 2000;Morikubo et al 2004;Storr-Paulsen et al 2008;Gonen et al 2012;Keenan et al 2012;Shimazaki et al 2014). Numerous studies investigated factors with an impact on the corneal endothelium during cataract surgery, such as ultrasound time and energy, temperature increase, nuclear fragments colliding with the corneal endothelium, firmness of the lens, turbulent flow during irrigation, fluctuating or increased intraocular pressure due to the bottle height of the irrigation solution, surgical instruments and techniques, as well as the formation of free radicals and the use of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) (Svensson & Mellerio 1994;Dick et al 1996;Hayashi et al 1996;Pirazzoli et al 1996;Cameron et al 2001;Miyata et al 2002;Takahashi et al 2002Takahashi et al , 2006Bourne et al 2004;Storr-Paulsen et al 2007Murano et al 2008;Suzuki et al 2009Suzuki et al , 2014Suzuki et al , 2016Ho & Afshari 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty (Dick et al 1996;D ıaz-Valle et al 1998;Walkow et al 2000;Morikubo et al 2004;Storr-Paulsen et al 2008;Gonen et al 2012;Keenan et al 2012;Shimazaki et al 2014). Numerous studies investigated factors with an impact on the corneal endothelium during cataract surgery, such as ultrasound time and energy, temperature increase, nuclear fragments colliding with the corneal endothelium, firmness of the lens, turbulent flow during irrigation, fluctuating or increased intraocular pressure due to the bottle height of the irrigation solution, surgical instruments and techniques, as well as the formation of free radicals and the use of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices (OVDs) (Svensson & Mellerio 1994;Dick et al 1996;Hayashi et al 1996;Pirazzoli et al 1996;Cameron et al 2001;Miyata et al 2002;Takahashi et al 2002Takahashi et al , 2006Bourne et al 2004;Storr-Paulsen et al 2007Murano et al 2008;Suzuki et al 2009Suzuki et al , 2014Suzuki et al , 2016Ho & Afshari 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative factors known to cause corneal endothelial damage include an excessive amount of ultrasound energy, 4,5 a localized rise in temperature, [6][7][8] air bubbles, 9,10 or collision of lens nucleus fragments with the corneal endothelium. 11 Another harmful factor that can damage the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification is oxidative stress, which is due to the generation of free radicals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal endothelium maintains hydration of the corneal tissues by acting as a barrier and a draining pump against the aqueous humor; thus, decreases in endothelial cell density can induce irreversible corneal edema (bullous keratopathy; BK), in turn causing permanently blurred vision and pain. With an excessive amount of US energy 1 2 , collision of lens nucleus fragments with the corneal endothelium 3 , air bubbles 4 5 , or a localized temperature rise 6 7 8 have been reported and are well known as factors damaging to the corneal endothelium. The development of free radicals has also been identified as a harmful factor associated with the use of US.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%