2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature gradient induced detonation development inside and outside a hotspot for different fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the present detonation regime is much broader than the one reported by Pan et al 22 for methane/air. This may be due to the fact that stronger criterion for detonation development was used by Pan et al 22 Figure 6 compares the detonation development regimes predicted by three kinetic models: GRI reduced, Aramco 3.0 and FFCM-1. Qualitatively, all these kinetic models predict the C-shaped boundaries for the detonation development regime.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…It is noted that the present detonation regime is much broader than the one reported by Pan et al 22 for methane/air. This may be due to the fact that stronger criterion for detonation development was used by Pan et al 22 Figure 6 compares the detonation development regimes predicted by three kinetic models: GRI reduced, Aramco 3.0 and FFCM-1. Qualitatively, all these kinetic models predict the C-shaped boundaries for the detonation development regime.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The diagram has been widely adopted to determine the detonation conditions for different fuels with good prediction (Bates et al 2016;Bates and Bradley 2017;Kalghatgi and Bradley 2012;Peters et al 2013;Dai et al 2015;Yu and Chen 2015;Dai et al 2017;Terashima et al 2017;Pan et al 2016Pan et al , 2017bWei et al 2018;Pan et al 2019;Sow et al 2019). The effects of multiple hot spots in terms of their size and separation distance have also been investigated in one-dimensional (1-D) configurations (Wei et al 2018;Terashima et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, being operated at elevated pressure and high-load conditions leads to a higher propensity of undesired preignition, knock, and even superknock [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Superknock is characterized as a developing detonation process featuring excessive pressure oscillations and extremely high-pressure amplitudes that can damage combustion-chamber components [7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]20]. Improved understandings of the superknock propensity and a reliable criterion to predict it are needed to prevent destructive operation of combustion devices [2,4,5,7,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%