2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12030534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Field Numerical Analysis Mode and Verification of Quenching Heat Treatment Using Carbon Steel in Rotating Laser Scanning

Abstract: Temperature history and hardening depth are experimentally characterized in the rotational laser hardening process for an AISI 1045 medium carbon steel specimen. A three-dimensional finite element model is proposed to predict the temperature field distribution and hardening zone area. The laser temperature field is set up for an average distribution and scanned along a circular path. Linear motion also takes place alongside rotation. The prediction of hardening area can be increased by increasing the rotationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the prediction accuracy, with most experiments, is within the thermal camera accuracy of 1%. This prediction accuracy is a significant improvement compared to the peak temperature prediction accuracy between 3.5% and 7% found in literature [9,[44][45][46]. Furthermore, the cooling rate prediction accuracy of the adaptive thermal model is between 1.4% and 15.0%.…”
Section: Adaptive Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the prediction accuracy, with most experiments, is within the thermal camera accuracy of 1%. This prediction accuracy is a significant improvement compared to the peak temperature prediction accuracy between 3.5% and 7% found in literature [9,[44][45][46]. Furthermore, the cooling rate prediction accuracy of the adaptive thermal model is between 1.4% and 15.0%.…”
Section: Adaptive Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The peak temperature prediction accuracy is between 1.2% and 6.1%. In comparison, other researchers state that their thermal models predict the peak temperature of the LHT process with an accuracy between 3.5% and 7% [9,[44][45][46]. Hence, the prediction accuracy of the thermal model developed in Chapter 3, even without adaptation, is already better compared to these other models.…”
Section: Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Theoretical prediction of thermal processes allows us to formulate the basic requirements for the parameters of the laser irradiation in order to improve efficiency. The increasing capabilities of computing tools justify the widespread use of numerical methods for solving the most complex tasks of laser heating, including unsteady three-dimensional problems of nonlinear thermal conductivity [31,32].…”
Section: Optical Systems For the Shaping Of Laser Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%