2024
DOI: 10.1039/d4fd00007b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependent stereodynamics in surface scattering measured through subtle changes in the molecular wave function

Helen Chadwick,
Gil Alexandrowicz

Abstract: A magnetically manipulated molecular beam technique is used to change the rotational orientation of H2 molecules which collide with a stepped Cu(511) surface and explore how the polarisation dependence of...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phys., 2024, 26, 19630-19645 | 19633 It follows that the only unknown in the signal expression given by eqn ( 5) is the scattering-matrix, which can be extracted from the experimental data as shown previously. 28,29 These empirical scattering-matrices are directly comparable to those obtained from state-of-the-art theoretical models 42 which is why the MMI experiments provide such valuable benchmarks for these calculations; both the amplitudes and phases of the S-matrix elements can be obtained, whereas other measurements, for example which measure scattering or reaction probabilities, [43][44][45] determine quantities which are equal to the square modulus of S-matrix elements. Whilst these do still have great value and play an important role in testing theoretical models, 4,6,46,47 they are insensitive to the phases of the S-matrix elements and are often also summed over more than one element of the S-matrix.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Phys., 2024, 26, 19630-19645 | 19633 It follows that the only unknown in the signal expression given by eqn ( 5) is the scattering-matrix, which can be extracted from the experimental data as shown previously. 28,29 These empirical scattering-matrices are directly comparable to those obtained from state-of-the-art theoretical models 42 which is why the MMI experiments provide such valuable benchmarks for these calculations; both the amplitudes and phases of the S-matrix elements can be obtained, whereas other measurements, for example which measure scattering or reaction probabilities, [43][44][45] determine quantities which are equal to the square modulus of S-matrix elements. Whilst these do still have great value and play an important role in testing theoretical models, 4,6,46,47 they are insensitive to the phases of the S-matrix elements and are often also summed over more than one element of the S-matrix.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 71%
“…1. The experimental setup has been described previously, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and so only the main details will be presented here with a particular focus on how the different components are simulated which allows signals to be calculated and the S-matrix to be extracted from the data. Here, elastic scattering of H 2 in the I = 1, J = 1 state is considered, which in the presence of a magnetic field can be split into three nuclear spin projection states (m I ) which each split into three rotational orientation projection states (m J ), giving a total of nine m I , m J states, the energies of which can be calculated using the Hamiltonian defined by Ramsey.…”
Section: Extraction Of the Scattering-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations