2013
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/26/6/065005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependent local atomic displacements in Ru substituted SmFe1−xRuxAsO0.85F0.15superconductors

Abstract: Local structure of SmFe1−xRuxAsO0.85F0.15 (x = 0.0, 0.05, 0.25 and 0.5) superconductors has been investigated by temperature dependent As K-edge extended x-ray absorption fine structure.The effect of Ru substitution remains confined to the iron-arsenide layer but neither the static disorder nor the Fe-As bond strength suffers any change for x ≤ 0.25. With further Ru substitution the static disorder increases while the Fe-As bond strength remains unchanged. Also, the Ru-As distance (∼2.42 Å), different from the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There, spin dilution would cause static magnetism to vanish for x Ru ≈0.6, close to the theoretical value 0.593 [68]. However, there is significant evidence of a nonrandom distribution of Ru and microscopic phase separation in Ru-poor and Ru-rich regions [66,[69][70][71][72][73], suggesting that the global Ru content is not the relevant parameter to describe percolation. In Appendix B, we propose a simple model to reinterpret the NQR data of Sanna et al [66] by assuming a phase separation in Fe-rich and Ru-rich regions.…”
Section: B Doping-dependencesupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There, spin dilution would cause static magnetism to vanish for x Ru ≈0.6, close to the theoretical value 0.593 [68]. However, there is significant evidence of a nonrandom distribution of Ru and microscopic phase separation in Ru-poor and Ru-rich regions [66,[69][70][71][72][73], suggesting that the global Ru content is not the relevant parameter to describe percolation. In Appendix B, we propose a simple model to reinterpret the NQR data of Sanna et al [66] by assuming a phase separation in Fe-rich and Ru-rich regions.…”
Section: B Doping-dependencesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Following the observation of microscopic phase separation in Fe-rich and Ru-rich regions in 1111 samples where iron has been partially substituted with ruthenium [66,[69][70][71][72][73], we propose a simple model to reinterpret the data of Ref. 66.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the change in the σ 2 for Fe-Se bond is much smaller than that for the Fe-Fe bond. Earlier EXAFS studies on iron-based systems have pointed out such a change in the Fe-As correlations31, however, it turned out to be very small in the subsequent studies3233. The presence of this anomaly, indicating a local mode hardening by cooling across T c , is a clear evidence of some correlation between electron-lattice interactions and superconductivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In cuprates, such anomalies were detected in several systems using extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy studies [18,19] and neutron diffraction based atomic pair distribution function (PDF) analysis [20,21]. EXAFS [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and x-ray PDF [30][31][32][33][34] studies were also yielded several important information on the FeSC, however, lack of high quality single crystals limited those studies. Here we report a systematic EXAFS study on the LaFe 1-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%