2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp412446h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-Dependent Deliquescence Relative Humidities and Water Activities Using Humidity Controlled Thermogravimetric Analysis with Application to Malonic Acid

Abstract: We utilize a new experimental technique, humidity-controlled thermogravimetric analysis (HTGA), to determine temperature-dependent deliquescence relative humidities (DRH) and to determine the equilibrium concentration of a solution at a given temperature and relative humidity. To that end, we have investigated the malonic acid/water system determining the DRH and concentration/RH relationship in the temperature range 303-278 K. Excellent agreement is found with literature values for the DRH of malonic acid as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, water uptake by CaCO 3 and Arizona test dust was measured at room temperature using a Mettler-Toledo TGA with an accuracy of 1 µg in mass measurement (Gustafsson et al, 2005), and about four monolayers of adsorbed water were formed at 80 % RH for both mineral dust samples. A similar instrument was utilized to determine the DRH of dicarboxylic acids and their sodium salts at different temperatures (Beyer et al, 2014;Schroeder and Beyer, 2016), and the DRH was found to decrease with temperature for malonic acid, from 80.2 % at 277 K to 69.5 % at 303 K (Beyer et al, 2014). This method was also used to probe water adsorption by different soot particles (Popovitcheva et al, 2001(Popovitcheva et al, , 2008a, although no details of the instrument used were provided.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, water uptake by CaCO 3 and Arizona test dust was measured at room temperature using a Mettler-Toledo TGA with an accuracy of 1 µg in mass measurement (Gustafsson et al, 2005), and about four monolayers of adsorbed water were formed at 80 % RH for both mineral dust samples. A similar instrument was utilized to determine the DRH of dicarboxylic acids and their sodium salts at different temperatures (Beyer et al, 2014;Schroeder and Beyer, 2016), and the DRH was found to decrease with temperature for malonic acid, from 80.2 % at 277 K to 69.5 % at 303 K (Beyer et al, 2014). This method was also used to probe water adsorption by different soot particles (Popovitcheva et al, 2001(Popovitcheva et al, , 2008a, although no details of the instrument used were provided.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, water uptake by CaCO3 and Arizona test dust was measured at room temperature using a Mettler-Toledo TGA with an accuracy of 1 μg in mass measurement (Gustafsson et al, 2005), and about 4 monolayers of adsorbed water were formed at 80% RH for both mineral dust samples. A similar instrument was utilized to determine the DRH of dicarboxylic acids and their sodium salts at different temperatures (Beyer et al, 2014;Schroeder and Beyer, 2016), and the DRH was found to decrease with temperature for malonic acid, from 80.2% at 277 K to 69.5% at 303 K (Beyer et al, 2014). This method was also used to probe water adsorption by different soot particles (Popovitcheva et al, 2001;Popovicheva et al, 2008a;Popovicheva et al, 2008b), although no details of the instrument used were provided.…”
Section: Thermogravimetric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminology "TDMA" was first introduced in 1986 in a study (Rader and McMurry, 1986) which showed that size change as small as 1% could be readily measured. In addition to size change due to humidification (humidity-TDMA), TDMAs can also be used to measure particle size change due to other processing such as heating (Bilde et al, 2015a). H-TDMA is probably the most widely used technique for aerosol hygroscopicity measurement in both laboratory (Gibson et al, 2006;Herich et al, 2009;Koehler et al, 2009;Wex et al, 2009a;Good et al, 2010b;Wu et al, 2011;Hu et al, 2014;Lei et al, 2014;Gomez-Hernandez et al, 2016;Jing et al, 2016;Zieger et al, 2017) and field studies (McMurry and Stolzenburg, 1989;Swietlicki et al, 2008;Ye et al, 2011;Ye et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2014b;Yeung et al, 2014b;Atkinson et al, 2015;Cheung et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2016;Sorooshian et al, 2017).…”
Section: Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the effect of buoyancy, which varies with RH (Beyer et al, 2014;Schroeder and Beyer, 2016), is also automatically taken into account by using an empty pan as the reference. Semispherical quartz crucibles with a volume of 180 µL, provided by the manufacturer, are used in this work as sample pans.…”
Section: Humidity Chambermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that two groups have used similar techniques to measure water adsorption by CaCO 3 and Arizona test dust (Gustafsson et al, 2005) and DRH of malonic acid, sodium oxalate, and sodium malonate (Beyer et al, 2014;Schroeder and Beyer, 2016). Nevertheless, the performance of this technique has never been systematically evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%